5 ms·
Ironic coming from the Guardian. One of their journalists consistently publishes ai slop and the paper is in denial about it. https://x.com/maxwelltani/status/
by maxrmk 6mo ago
Ironic coming from the Guardian. One of their journalists consistently publishes ai slop and the paper is in denial about it.
https://x.com/maxwelltani/status/2023089526445371777?s=46 https://x.com/maxwelltani/status/2023089526445371777?s=46
- zarzavat 6mo agoIt doesn't seem AI generated to me. Are we at the point where you have to write in a particularly outrageous style in order to not be accused of using AI?
- maxrmk 6mo agoFair enough. It reads as extremely AI generated to me. But that isn’t completely reliable.
- gruez 6mo ago>Are we at the point where you have to write in a particularly outrageous style in order to not be accused of using AI? I don't think we've gotten to the extent that all popular writing styles (eg. hamburger paragraphs) are considered suspect, but the "it's not just X, it's Y" construction[1] attracts particular scrutiny. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing#Negative_parallelisms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing#...
- philipp-gayret 6mo agoThis is either ChatGPT or the one journalist who influenced all of ChatGPT's writing style.
- gruez 6mo agoIf you look at the replies[1] to that tweet, many commenters point out his style was entirely different prior to chatgpt. [1] https://xcancel.com/maxwelltani/status/2023089526445371777 https://xcancel.com/maxwelltani/status/2023089526445371777?
- philipp-gayret 6mo agoI was giving this the benefit of the doubt as well and was just looking at his older writings that have a little "This article is more than 5 years old" banner above it. Looks totally different indeed.