5 ms·

I had to look up what a content mill is. I'm not one, I think. It's "random" stuff because my interests are different. These posts are not written sequentially,

I had to look up what a content mill is. I'm not one, I think. It's "random" stuff because my interests are different. These posts are not written sequentially, I've been working on them (except for this MicroGPT one) for weeks and only publishing now.

UltraSane 7mo ago
It has gotten to the point you need timestamped keystrokes and a screen recording to prove you actually wrote something yourself.
- bonoboTP 7mo ago
  Soon you'll be able to generate a video with AI that shows you typing the entire thing, and will narrate it in your own voice with voice cloning.
  - sincerely 7mo ago
    This already exists in visual art: timelapses of the drawing process were being used to prove that pictures weren’t AI generated, until someone made a program that takes a picture and generates a fake progress vid
gwern 7mo ago
Dude, you literally start the article with > Andrej Karpathy wrote a 200-line Python script that trains and runs a GPT from scratch, with no libraries or dependencies, just pure Python. Almost immediately afterwards, you have a section titled "Numbers, not letters". Need I go on? Interestingly, despite all the AI tics, the opening passes Pangram as 100% human... though all the following sections I randomly checked also come back as 100% AI. So the simplest explanation would be that you are operating adversarially and you tweaked the opening to target Pangram (perhaps through a anti-AI-detection service, which now exist and are being used by the cutting edge, as Pangram is known to be relatively easy to beat, similar to how people started search-and-replacing em-dashes when that got a little too well known), which unfortunately means I now expect you to lie to me in your response since you apparently went that far to start building up clout. (BTW, how did you accidentally pick 4 rare names which were in the dataset? "Thanks, will fix" is not a real response to that observation. Are you also going to remove all of the 'just pure X' and 'Y, not X' constructions from your posts now that I've pointed it out?)
- gwern 7mo ago
  (Pangram commentary: https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028620466995220568 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028620466995220568 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028689219112034436 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028689219112034436 )
- deleted 7mo ago
  [deleted]

UltraSane 7mo ago

It has gotten to the point you need timestamped keystrokes and a screen recording to prove you actually wrote something yourself.

bonoboTP 7mo ago
Soon you'll be able to generate a video with AI that shows you typing the entire thing, and will narrate it in your own voice with voice cloning.
- sincerely 7mo ago
  This already exists in visual art: timelapses of the drawing process were being used to prove that pictures weren’t AI generated, until someone made a program that takes a picture and generates a fake progress vid

gwern 7mo ago

Dude, you literally start the article with > Andrej Karpathy wrote a 200-line Python script that trains and runs a GPT from scratch, with no libraries or dependencies, just pure Python. Almost immediately afterwards, you have a section titled "Numbers, not letters". Need I go on? Interestingly, despite all the AI tics, the opening passes Pangram as 100% human... though all the following sections I randomly checked also come back as 100% AI. So the simplest explanation would be that you are operating adversarially and you tweaked the opening to target Pangram (perhaps through a anti-AI-detection service, which now exist and are being used by the cutting edge, as Pangram is known to be relatively easy to beat, similar to how people started search-and-replacing em-dashes when that got a little too well known), which unfortunately means I now expect you to lie to me in your response since you apparently went that far to start building up clout. (BTW, how did you accidentally pick 4 rare names which were in the dataset? "Thanks, will fix" is not a real response to that observation. Are you also going to remove all of the 'just pure X' and 'Y, not X' constructions from your posts now that I've pointed it out?)

gwern 7mo ago
(Pangram commentary: https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028620466995220568 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028620466995220568 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028689219112034436 https://x.com/max_spero_/status/2028689219112034436 )
deleted 7mo ago
[deleted]