5 ms·
Death threats mainly. Personally I think it would be easier if they just made it so that platforms ran a tiny LLM against the content that will be posted - dete
by almosthere 7mo ago
Death threats mainly. Personally I think it would be easier if they just made it so that platforms ran a tiny LLM against the content that will be posted - determined if it is a death threat, then require them to be identified before it's posted, then it would solve a lot of these problems.
TLDR: Evil people be doxxed internally not everyone.
- bigfishrunning 7mo agoa "tiny large language model"? lol
- almosthere 7mo agoYeah, a small one that is cheaper because they'll be processing billions of messages per year.
- lazide 7mo agoGood thing all the kind people doing death threats won’t just bypass it?
- almosthere 7mo agoI'm totally lost here. If you don't identify, you don't post.
- lazide 7mo agoGood thing no one ever breaks any rules!
- BenjiWiebe 7mo agoIf a platform decides to require an account to post, or requires your message to pass an LLM sniff test before publishing it, you can break all the rules you want but your message won't be visible to others on said platform.
- lazide 7mo agoThe example given was a ‘lightweight LLM’ by the poster, which sounded an awful lot like client side? If server side, you already have the heavyweight stuff going on, and yes there is no need to do all the bypassable shenanigans.
- almosthere 7mo agoSince that client side llm would be processing billions of messages each year on each person's laptop, lol
- reverius42 7mo agoSee https://tinyllm.org https://tinyllm.org These days the name "LLM" refers more to the architecture & usage patterns than it does to the size of model (though to be fair, even the "tiny" LLMs are huge compared to any models from 10+ years ago, so it's all relative).
- numpad0 7mo agoThat turns jokes into contracts that nobody wants. Bad idea.