6 ms·

Which success? I still see those things churning out laughably wrong code at every turn.

• delaminator 7mo ago
  I guess everyone stopped using Claude Code already then, if it doesn't work.
  • coldtea 7mo ago
    It doesn't work precisely because people are using claude. If it worked, there'd be no people using it.
    • Kye 7mo ago
      Nobody goes there, it's too crowded.
      • coldtea 7mo ago
        "It's not revolutionary automation if every 'automator' has an operator attached" - doesn't take a Yogi to figure out...
• simianwords 7mo ago
  [flagged]
  • danielbln 7mo ago
    [flagged]
• ubercore 7mo ago
  It's not a point and click code machine, but it's laughably wrong to say they just churn out laughably wrong code.
  • noosphr 7mo ago
    Half of developers are below average. Half of developers say that the code Ai produces is amazing. Would you like a venn diagram?
    • dash2 7mo ago
      You’re saying that AI is already good enough to replace 50% of developers. Sounds like you agree it will be very important.
      • rwmj 7mo ago
        He's saying the good half of developers have to deal with the increased slop output of the bad half. Probably will be overwhelmed by it, in the end.
        • ubercore 7mo ago
          It _can_ produce slop if people stop thinking. I've also seen it do just fine, when people know when, where and how to use it. That's the part that frightens me, not the code it makes itself.
          • noosphr 7mo ago
            I will have to bring out the Venn diagram.
            • ubercore 7mo ago
              Go ahead!
    • ludicrousdispla 7mo ago
      minor correction: they say AI produces code that is 'mostly' amazing.
    • keeda 7mo ago
• cleaning 7mo ago
  You're telling on yourself here