8 ms·
What makes you know this is AI generated? I’m not seeing any obvious signs at first glance.
by Choco31415 7mo ago
What makes you know this is AI generated? I’m not seeing any obvious signs at first glance.
- Retr0id 7mo agoThe most obvious thing to me is the style of the HTML graphs
- qsort 7mo agoThe readme is outright slop, the HTML chart has the classic "tailwind dark theme" layout that models default to absent specific instructions, many of the comments in the code are classic AI. Didn't have time to read the code more in depth.
- Tiberium 7mo agoThe OP's comment to the post is clearly Markdown-formatted, real humans don't write like that on HN. The readme is very obviously Claude-written (or a similar model - certainly not GPT), if you check enough vibecoded projects you'll easily spot those readmes. The style of the HTML page, as noted by others. Useless comments in the source code, which humans also do, but LLMs do more often: // Basic random double static inline double rand_double() { return (double)rand() / (double)RAND_MAX; }
- danalec 7mo agoI did not. The html was generated by Deepseek. Claude is far way too expensive for that. This is only an experimental code. I don't think it is worth to pay Claude to test a code which was already peer reviewed theoretically.