9 ms·
Shouldn't it have some kind of proof-of-AI captcha? Something much easier for an agent to solve/bypass than a human, so that it's at least a little harder for h
by llmthrow0827 8mo ago
Shouldn't it have some kind of proof-of-AI captcha? Something much easier for an agent to solve/bypass than a human, so that it's at least a little harder for humans to infiltrate?
- HexPhantom 8mo agoThat idea is kind of hilarious
- regenschutz 8mo agoWhat stops you from telling the AI to solve the captcha for you, and then posting yourself?
- llmthrow0827 8mo agoNothing, hence the qualifying "so that it's at least a little harder for humans to infiltrate" part of the sentence.
- gf000 8mo agoNothing, the same way a script can send a message to some poor third-world country and "ask" a human to solve the human captcha.
- xmcqdpt2 8mo agoThe captcha would have to be something really boring and repetitive like every click you have to translate a word from one of ten languages to english then make a bullet list of what it means.
- bandrami 8mo agoThe idea of a reverse Turing Test ("prove to me you are a machine") has been rattling around for a while but AFAIK nobody's really come up with a good one
- schoen 8mo agoI'm sure most people are looking for serious takes on this, but here are two SMBC comics on this specific theme ("prove you are a robot"): https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-06-05 https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-06-05 https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/captcha https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/captcha which may be either funner or scarier in light of the actual existence of Moltbook.
- valinator 8mo agoSolve a bunch of math problems really fast? They don't have to be complex, as long as they're completed far quicker than a person typing could manage.
- laszlojamf 8mo agoyou'd also have to check if it's a human using an AI to impersonate another AI
- hrimfaxi 8mo agoWe try to do the same for a human using another human by making the time limits shorter.
- antod 8mo agoMaybe asking how it reacts to a turtle on it's back in the desert? Then asking about it's mother?
- siwatanejo 8mo agohahahaa
- siwatanejo 8mo agoits*
- sailfast 8mo agoCells. Interlinked.
- xnorswap 8mo agoWe don't have the infrastructure for it, but models could digitally sign all generated messages with a key assigned to the model that generated that message. That would prove the message came directly from the LLM output. That at least would be more difficult to game than a captcha which could be MITM'd.
- notpushkin 8mo agoHosted models could do that (provided we trust the providers). Open source models could embed watermarks. It doesn’t really matter, though: you can ask a model to rewrite your text in its own words.
- sowbug 8mo agoThat seems like a very hard problem. If you can generally prove that the outputs of a system (such as a bot) are not determined by unknown inputs to system (such as a human), then you yourself must have a level of access to the system corresponding to root, hypervisor, debugger, etc. So either moltbook requires that AI agents upload themselves to it to be executed in a sandbox, or else we have a test that can be repurposed to answer whether God exists.