6 ms·
We will try everything except regulating the algorithmic content feeds themselves.
by javascriptfan69 8mo ago
We will try everything except regulating the algorithmic content feeds themselves.
- causalscience 8mo agoYo, I'm all for banning all of these companies from my country. That would be ideal. But then you'll have HN: NOOOO it's not effective, people will just use VPNs nanny state! Oppression! Freedom of speech!
- pibaker 8mo agoIf algorithmic feed is so bad then why are you on hacker news, a website with an algorithmic feed that is notoriously non-transparent and often accused of being manipulated by bad actors?
- javascriptfan69 8mo ago"If smoking is so bad then why are you smoking?" Because I'm addicted like everyone else.
- pibaker 8mo agoGo to your account page, turn on noprocrast and set minaway to a very large number. You effectively ban your own account once you click confirm. Now set up home firewall / device blocking settings and block the HN domain. The first step towards overcoming addiction is admitting that you have one. I pray for your speedy recovery.
- deaux 8mo agoBecause obviously "algorithmic" is an oversimplification. Even a chronological feed is "algorithmic". What needs banning is the combination of "behavioral personalization + infinite content/scroll". HN's feed has neither of these elements.
- NekkoDroid 8mo agoI assume they mean personalized algorithms and not algorithms in general as that would encompas literally anything programmed not based on true RNG. And to my knowledge HN doesn't have any personalized feed.