18 ms·
They currently use administrative warrants but I’m in favor of requiring judicial warrants.
by PlanksVariable 8mo ago
They currently use administrative warrants but I’m in favor of requiring judicial warrants.
- fzeroracer 8mo agoBoss, they already require judicial warrants. They're blatantly violating constitutional rights. Do you think we have constitutional rights or not? Do we have laws or not?
- PlanksVariable 8mo agoI agree, but I’m clarifying the facts: they’re claiming an administrative warrant gives them authority to enter a house, not no warrant as OP stated.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- direwolf20 8mo agoAn administrative warrant is just an email from their boss telling them to do it. It's not a real thing
- e44858 8mo agoHas this ever been tested in court?
- direwolf20 8mo agoWhat would that even mean? You present the judge an email from your boss and ask "Your Honour, is this an email from my boss?"
- ok_dad 8mo agoThis is a serious topic but holy crap can you imagine that. I feel like I’m in bizarro world that anyone takes that argument seriously.
- jfyi 8mo agoGreat, since we are all in agreement, let's see if we can put it clear terms. Administrative warrants are civil in nature and do not give authority to enter a house or any private space. Using them as such is in violation of the fourth amendment.
- ok_dad 8mo agoAdministrative warrants aren’t legal court issued warrants, we’re have three branches of government for a reason. As far as the law of the land goes these ICE officers are violating most of the Bill of Rights.