12 ms·
This entirely depends on your perspective/interpretation of “text-only”. To me, having only text as the output with no ads, videos, or images is “text-only”. I
by subless 9mo ago
This entirely depends on your perspective/interpretation of “text-only”.
To me, having only text as the output with no ads, videos, or images is “text-only”. It doesn’t matter how it’s presented as long as it’s just text.
But I also see your perspective. You want plain defaults with white background color, black foreground color, and no formatting.
- loganc2342 9mo agoIt’s more so that “text” in this case refers to “text (.txt) file” rather than “letters and numbers”
- eleventen 9mo agoThis thread is about text the MIME type. It’s not a subjective definition. > The rules are simple - content which has the MIME type of text/plain. No HTML, no multimedia, no RTF, no XML, no ANSI colour escape sequences. Your definition is fine for you, but it’s not what TFA is about.
- abejfehr 9mo agoI feel like the article should've been called "plaintext-only websites" or something, because if you had asked me I would've also defined "text-only" as image/video-less websites
- kgwxd 9mo ago"No arbitrary code execution" is how I'd put it. "Ads" can be plain text, they just usually aren't on the internet. If a plain text site decided to include them once in a while, I'd celebrate the choice.
- ynac 9mo agoI struggle with the purity of meaning for text-only as well. Before this thread, I didn't understand the mime settings; I've been living a lie with a browser friendly landing page that uses: <!DOCTYPE HTML><plaintext> And then all the other pages of the site to be pure *.txt files. In the end, until there are standards to point to, I just accept minimalism as the scale. I have ads, layouts, boxes / frames, and all sorts of possibly annoying aspects to my textsites. It is a medium that's just as easily abused as any!