6 ms·
The first PDF is the record of a remote viewing session from 2 days before the USS Stark incident, and it is eerily similar to the incident. The feelings and "
by noworld 9mo ago
The first PDF is the record of a remote viewing session from 2 days before the USS Stark incident, and it is eerily similar to the incident. The feelings and "atmosphere" (can't think of a better word for it) sound like what you might expect on a ship being attacked by a random missile.
For example:
1. The drawing on p. 7 looks like the superstructure of a warship.
2. The next few pages might describe what it feels like to wonder if your ship is actually under missile attack.
3. On page 10 it records "aircraft--large, multiengined; distant; orbiting; distraction controlled, directed. 'Under orders.'" This USNI article has a little more detail on the AWACS plane detecting the incoming attack: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/june/assault-stark https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/j...
There are other similarities, but the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange.
- FuturisticLover 9mo agoYeah, Remote Viewing should be a real-time event. This is Precognition.
- therobots927 9mo agoWhy does it need to be real- time? If rv is possible then it’s naive to assume that time is somehow “special” vs 3D. It’s possible that time is not unfolding linearly, that is only an illusion. “Remote” could involve accessing information from along the time dimension.
- FuturisticLover 9mo agoI guess that makes sense. My tiny brain is still processing all the information. Thinking beyond 3D or space/time is impossible for me.
- dylan604 9mo agoLong ago I was told of looking at a timeline so that time "travels" from left to right is the normal view, but now rotate that timeline so that it appears as a dot to you. You now see all events of the timeline, but without reference to "when" they happened. Lots of scifi plots are also described as such
- therobots927 9mo agoThink about a maze drawn on a piece of paper. Because we’re in 3D you can see all of the maze at once but if you were a 2D entity inside the maze you would only see the walls / entrances / exits directly in front or behind you. Now imagine drawing a line from the entrance to the exit - that’s 2D + a time dimension. Now make it a 3D maze and an entity existing outside of spacetime would be able to see all events happening at once in 3D.
- squigz 9mo agoHow many of these 'remote viewing' sessions didn't bear any similarities to anything? If you throw a bunch of stuff at a wall, some of it is going to stick. Especially when it appears to be random words that can be applicable to millions of situations.
- an0malous 9mo ago> Using the standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established. The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is ex- pected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted. Effects of a magnitude similar to those found in government sponsored research at SRI and SAIC have been replicated at a number of laboratories around the world. Such consistency cannot be readily explained by claims of flaws or fraud. From Jessica Utts, who was the president of the American Statistical Association and asked to review the Stanford Research Institute psychic programs (including Star Gate). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333228024_An_Assessment_of_the_Evidence_for_Psychic_Functioning https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333228024_An_Assess...
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- someothherguyy 9mo agoThat says 2019, but it was published in 1995: https://ics.uci.edu/~jutts/air.pdf https://ics.uci.edu/~jutts/air.pdf This goes into way more detail and covers Utts's work. https://www.priory-of-sion.com/biblios/images/mumford.pdf https://www.priory-of-sion.com/biblios/images/mumford.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Utts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Utts
- squigz 9mo ago> Using the standards applied to any other area of science Assuming this is true, I have to wonder why it would be that the science community apparently places a higher burden of proof on this sort of research, and whether that higher standard has been earned or not.
- akatechis 9mo ago> the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange It's only strange if you believe the CIA released notes from their super-secret psychic program rather than the more plausible explanation that this is disinformation that was backdated for a boost of prestige.
- __patchbit__ 9mo agoA spicily prepared `false flag' operation dead drop will do the time travel trick especially given the CIA is being outgamed on all the dimensions.
- buildsjets 9mo agoAlways nice to stumble across your posts. Any progress on the jailbreak?
- noworld 9mo agoCan you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump to "this has to be BS" rather than keeping an open mind.
- the_af 9mo agoExtraordinary claims (that RV is a real phenomenon) require extraordinary evidence. The null hypothesis is the default position, it requires no extraordinary evidence; the opposite does. This is scientific method 101. Let's not pretend we're not familiar with it just because some dodgy CIA document surfaced.
- noworld 9mo agoAh, since the claim contradicts materialism, you get to make up a scenario, present no evidence, then put the burden on the other side. Got it. There's literally extraordinary evidence in the PDF, you just don't like it.