5 ms·
Friendly reminder: There is no ghost in the machine. It is a system executing code, not a being having thoughts. Let’s admire the tool without projecting a pers
by distalx 9mo ago
Friendly reminder: There is no ghost in the machine. It is a system executing code, not a being having thoughts. Let’s admire the tool without projecting a personality onto it.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- ngruhn 9mo agoConsciousness is weird and nobody understands it. There is no good reason to assume that these systems have it. But there is also no good reason to rule it out.
- squidbeak 9mo agoYou sound as if you have grounds for certainty about this. What are they?
- dr_dshiv 9mo agoThat’s the old way of thinking about it. there is a new way.
- skybrian 9mo agoFor me, that’s kind of the point. It’s similar to how the characters in a novel don’t really exist, and yet you can’t really discuss what happens in a novel without pretending that they do. It doesn’t really make sense to treat the author’s motivations and each character’s motivations as the same. Similarly, we’re all talking to ghosts now, which aren’t real, and yet there is something there that we can talk about. There are obvious behavioral differences depending on what persona the LLM is generating text for. I also like the hint of danger in “talking to ghosts.” It’s difficult to see how a rational adult could be in any danger from just talking, but I believe the news reports that some people who get too deep into it get “possessed.”