4 ms·
The problem with old computers isn’t that they’re slow but fail randomly so they don’t need “smaller” Linux, they need more resiliency that can work with random
by monus 9mo ago
The problem with old computers isn’t that they’re slow but fail randomly so they don’t need “smaller” Linux, they need more resiliency that can work with random RAM erros, corrupt disks, absurd CPU instruction failures.
The size was a 90s problem.
- lionkor 9mo agoDo you have any recommendations on resilient software and practices?
- shakna 9mo agoMy old computers that I still run _are_ 90s machines. Well, technically the eee is '07. But it is 32bit and everything that entails.
- LPisGood 9mo agoWhat sorts of techniques can be used to deal with those issues?
- dorfsmay 9mo agoThe real issue is that old hardware use a lot of electrical power. You can get a small Single Board Computer with at least as much computing power as those but using 20 to 30 time less electrical power, and fitting in the palm of your hand.
- mikkupikku 9mo agoIt's not really a real problem for most retro computing enthusiasts; it only comes out to a couple of bucks a month in electricity, and that's assuming you leave the computer running all month.
- vbezhenar 9mo agoIt's not an issue, it's just a price to pay.