5 ms·

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

dwattttt 10mo ago
"Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty (money & power), to purchase a little temporary Safety (a veto over a taxation dispute, trying to raise money from the Penn family), deserve neither Liberty (said money & power) nor Safety (the defense that said taxed money would've bought from the present French & Indian wars)"
- zahlman 10mo ago
  The context of the original quote doesn't prevent others from finding it more generally applicable or well-put.
  - potato3732842 10mo ago
    It's kind of funny if you think about it. Franklin spent so many years arguing for liberty, low taxes and limited government that when he tried to argue in favor of taxation and federal power he unintentionally still argued in favor of the former.
    - Terr_ 10mo ago
      A lot of our political discussions and systems these days are warped by a failure to understand the ways that state-versus-federal differences have changed over time. Even today, it's not necessarily hypocritical for someone to argue that states should do more X while the federal government should do less X.
  - dwattttt 10mo ago
    It doesn't, but at that point you're not referencing what a person meant, you're saying something they didn't intend with their words. You might as well make your point with your words, instead of misleadingly quoting someone else.
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]
- Terr_ 10mo ago
  > Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty No, you've got it half-backwards. He's saying the democratic legislature shouldn't forever give up the citizens' collective Liberty to tax the ultra-mega-rich (Penns) in exchange for a one-time Security payment from those rich near-nobles. https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famous-liberty-safety-quote-lost-its-context-in-21st-century https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famou...
  - dwattttt 10mo ago
    Ironically you're correct, and yet I'm still closer to the original meaning than the typical quotation.
estearum 10mo ago
And yet every society makes exactly this trade off. There is no such thing as avoiding this trade off entirely.
GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago
i will never tire of the irony of a man who owned humans being lauded as a freedom fighter.
- pseudalopex 10mo ago
  Benjamin Franklin became an abolitionist.[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Slavery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Slavery
  - GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago
    what that wikipedia article doesn't mention is that Franklin continued to own people for almost his entire adult life, while paying lip service to abolition.
- CamperBob2 10mo ago
  Whatever you're doing at the moment, I'll bet somebody 200 years from now will condemn it. It might not even take that long, at the rate we're progressing.
  - GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago
    i can confidently say that i don't personally engage with any activities that constitute extreme deprivation of another individual's liberties while simultaneously advocating for those liberties, which is what i was specifically talking about. please, if you must, accuse me of something concrete.

"Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty (money & power), to purchase a little temporary Safety (a veto over a taxation dispute, trying to raise money from the Penn family), deserve neither Liberty (said money & power) nor Safety (the defense that said taxed money would've bought from the present French & Indian wars)"

zahlman 10mo ago
The context of the original quote doesn't prevent others from finding it more generally applicable or well-put.
- potato3732842 10mo ago
  It's kind of funny if you think about it. Franklin spent so many years arguing for liberty, low taxes and limited government that when he tried to argue in favor of taxation and federal power he unintentionally still argued in favor of the former.
  - Terr_ 10mo ago
    A lot of our political discussions and systems these days are warped by a failure to understand the ways that state-versus-federal differences have changed over time. Even today, it's not necessarily hypocritical for someone to argue that states should do more X while the federal government should do less X.
- dwattttt 10mo ago
  It doesn't, but at that point you're not referencing what a person meant, you're saying something they didn't intend with their words. You might as well make your point with your words, instead of misleadingly quoting someone else.
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
Terr_ 10mo ago
> Those (the Penn family) who would give up essential Liberty No, you've got it half-backwards. He's saying the democratic legislature shouldn't forever give up the citizens' collective Liberty to tax the ultra-mega-rich (Penns) in exchange for a one-time Security payment from those rich near-nobles. https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famous-liberty-safety-quote-lost-its-context-in-21st-century https://www.npr.org/2015/03/02/390245038/ben-franklins-famou...
- dwattttt 10mo ago
  Ironically you're correct, and yet I'm still closer to the original meaning than the typical quotation.

estearum 10mo ago

And yet every society makes exactly this trade off. There is no such thing as avoiding this trade off entirely.

GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago

i will never tire of the irony of a man who owned humans being lauded as a freedom fighter.

pseudalopex 10mo ago
Benjamin Franklin became an abolitionist.[1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Slavery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Slavery
- GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago
  what that wikipedia article doesn't mention is that Franklin continued to own people for almost his entire adult life, while paying lip service to abolition.
CamperBob2 10mo ago
Whatever you're doing at the moment, I'll bet somebody 200 years from now will condemn it. It might not even take that long, at the rate we're progressing.
- GuinansEyebrows 10mo ago
  i can confidently say that i don't personally engage with any activities that constitute extreme deprivation of another individual's liberties while simultaneously advocating for those liberties, which is what i was specifically talking about. please, if you must, accuse me of something concrete.