6 ms·

[flagged]

• dmitrygr 10mo ago
  If it doesn’t revolve around her, why should revolve it around you? Why do you think your view is somehow better? I admit we have a disagreement, but you have not presented a reason why your view is more correct. Also “shill”? I don’t work for Apple. I am not Tim Cook. I have no reason to shill for anyone. That’s just an ad hominem.
  • kelthuzad 10mo ago
    [flagged]
    • dmitrygr 10mo ago
      Yeah. I worked (past tense) there so guess I’m forever not allowed to disagree with Apple? But I also worked at Google, so that too. Man… I’m screwed on so many topics then…
      • kelthuzad 10mo ago
        >Yeah. I worked (past tense) there so guess I’m forever not allowed to disagree with Apple? What? You don't disagree with Apple anywhere in this thread; you are hellbent on defending their consumer hostile and anti-competitive business practices with the most absurd narratives and that's exactly the problem. It's a strong indicator that you're highly likely to still be an Apple shareholder since you've worked there, which perfectly explains your persistent bias in your Apple apologia. > But I also worked at Google, so that too. Man… I’m screwed on so many topics then… Yes imagine, but the proper terminology is "conflict of interest". It seems new to you, have a read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest