11 ms·
The SAFE-T act of 2021 requires https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE-T_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE-T_Act "all law enforcement agencies to use body came
by mikebonnell 11mo ago
The SAFE-T act of 2021 requires https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE-T_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE-T_Act "all law enforcement agencies to use body cameras by 2025". This is alongside research that indicates it is beneficial and cost-effective https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20533586-cl_bwc-study/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20533586-cl_bwc-stud...
The judge's insistence may come from other times that a judge's order has been ignored https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-admin-ignores-judges-order-bring-deportation-planes/story?id=119857181 https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-admin-ignores-judges-order-b...
- SilverElfin 11mo agoThe act you’re referring to is Illinois statute and doesn’t apply to federal agents.
- brendang_sd 11mo agoExcept a state law does and cannot force federal law enforcement to do anything, no matter how good of an idea body cameras may be.
- epwr 11mo agoThat is not true. State laws cannot interfere with the work of federal law enforcement, but can require certain behaviours. Eg. States set speed limits. A federal LEO can break these when required for their duties (eg. chasing a suspect), but only when required (eg. if they are late for a meeting, they still have to obey traffic laws). Body cameras do not seem to directly interfere with an LEO’s duty, unless “avoiding accountability” is literally their duty.
- mikebonnell 11mo agoBut is a federal judge ruling on federal agents, and in the case of the national guard seems to be under control of the state? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/12406
- brendang_sd 11mo agoI wasn't addressing the ruling by the judge, only the poster commenting on a state law, suggesting it's applicability here.