5 ms·
The article was fascinating, but the part I didn't see was... what was the motive? Assuming the article paints an accurate picture of what was going on... why w
by phil-martin 1y ago
The article was fascinating, but the part I didn't see was... what was the motive? Assuming the article paints an accurate picture of what was going on... why was it going on? Is it solely because he runs a company in the same competitive space?
- fragmede 1y ago> And I believe that’s why Michael is doing what he’s doing. He wins when Codesmith loses. Yes.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- lemagedurage 1y agoYes, he owns a competitor with his wife, formation.dev, so there is a clear incentive.
- peab 1y agoWhy didn't the author sue? Feels like this is a case where if what he says is true then that's what litigation is for, no?
- baobun 1y agoThe author is not a party to the case but an investigative blogger.
- devmor 1y agoLawsuits can be very expensive. Even if you win. I’ve given up on recovering tens of thousands of dollars in the past because it would likely ruin me to pursue it.
- peab 1y agoBut in this case there's a multi million dollar company on the line, it seems appropriate.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]