5 ms·

Actually it’s everybody’s problem, since job inflexibility is one of the reasons why Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. Who exactly ben

by naldb 1y ago

Actually it’s everybody’s problem, since job inflexibility is one of the reasons why Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. Who exactly benefits from a business going under? Its bigger competitors? The less well off are the ones that suffer the most from oligarchic sectors and cartels.

surgical_fire 1y ago
> Actually it’s everybody’s problem, since job inflexibility is one of the reasons why Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. Except it is not. I chose to live in the EU when I had the option to move to the US, and it is fine. Unless your measurement of "being poor" is that you can't exploit people in a get rich quick scheme and make destructive amounts of money but being acquired or dumping your IPO in the stock market.
- naldb 1y ago
  We are talking here about businesses with say 10 employees that go through dire straits and can’t fire people to survive. The only solution is to close down and lay EVERYONE off. IPO? Get rich quick scheme? Why is hyperbole the only response to this actual issue?
  - surgical_fire 11mo ago
    Again, of the business with only 10 employees cannot survive, it was due to the incompetence of those managing it. Part of a healthy economy is allowing businesses to fail, so that others can take its place. If demand for those services exist, other businesses will take it. If the demand is not there, the business should not exist. How your reply is related to the previous point of "Europe being poor" is for anyone to guess.
Muromec 1y ago
>Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. is it? >Who exactly benefits from a business going under? Its bigger competitors? The less well off are the ones that suffer the most from oligarchic sectors and cartels. The big thing going under right now is legacy auto manufacturers in Germany. That's sad, but the same happened in US without all the labor protections. It's just a lifecycle of industries -- they got fat and comfortable. The way German manufacturers managed to outlive US ones while having stronger labor laws seems to contradict you story big time.
onraglanroad 1y ago
> Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. By GDP per capita, 7 of the top 10 countries in the world are European. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi... Given this fact, will you now question your priors, or try to find a new justification for them?
- senordevnyc 11mo ago
  Many of those countries have smaller populations and economies than American cities. The EU as a whole has less than half the GDP per capita than the USA.
  - surgical_fire 11mo ago
    So what? GDP is a measurement of market value of goods and services. This hyperfocus on GDP is a societal disease, and all sorts of terrible policy derives from this hyperfocus. There's a nice public park on my neighborhood. It's a very scenic place, with a river going through it, with trees along its course, there's also a playground for kids with a large lawn area where people do picnics and relax around. Very pleasant place. That park generates 0 GDP. From a GDP standpoint, it would make more sense to remove the public park and turn it into a concrete hellscape for people to park their cars. Large cars preferably - huge SUVs or pickup trucks for that matter, no weakass economic cheap hybrids. GDP has to grow after all. And if that came to pass, the lives of everyone here would be miserable. But GDP would be higher, so that wins.
    - senordevnyc 11mo ago
      Hey, I didn’t pick the metric, I was just responding to someone who had. I’ve lived in both Europe and America, and if my personal situation allowed for it right now, I’d prefer to be in Europe. But I also do think GDP can be a useful metric, especially in the long run. I think Europe has great QoL, but I think it’s naive to not look at the growth rates of the major countries in the world and not be concerned about the long-term future of the European economy. Edit: you’re also wrong about the park. Someone paid to create it, and someone pays to maintain it. Both of those numbers show up in GDP.

by naldb 1y ago

surgical_fire 1y ago

> Actually it’s everybody’s problem, since job inflexibility is one of the reasons why Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. Except it is not. I chose to live in the EU when I had the option to move to the US, and it is fine. Unless your measurement of "being poor" is that you can't exploit people in a get rich quick scheme and make destructive amounts of money but being acquired or dumping your IPO in the stock market.

naldb 1y ago
We are talking here about businesses with say 10 employees that go through dire straits and can’t fire people to survive. The only solution is to close down and lay EVERYONE off. IPO? Get rich quick scheme? Why is hyperbole the only response to this actual issue?
- surgical_fire 11mo ago
  Again, of the business with only 10 employees cannot survive, it was due to the incompetence of those managing it. Part of a healthy economy is allowing businesses to fail, so that others can take its place. If demand for those services exist, other businesses will take it. If the demand is not there, the business should not exist. How your reply is related to the previous point of "Europe being poor" is for anyone to guess.

Muromec 1y ago

>Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. is it? >Who exactly benefits from a business going under? Its bigger competitors? The less well off are the ones that suffer the most from oligarchic sectors and cartels. The big thing going under right now is legacy auto manufacturers in Germany. That's sad, but the same happened in US without all the labor protections. It's just a lifecycle of industries -- they got fat and comfortable. The way German manufacturers managed to outlive US ones while having stronger labor laws seems to contradict you story big time.

onraglanroad 1y ago

> Europe is so poor compared to other first world countries. By GDP per capita, 7 of the top 10 countries in the world are European. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi... Given this fact, will you now question your priors, or try to find a new justification for them?

senordevnyc 11mo ago
Many of those countries have smaller populations and economies than American cities. The EU as a whole has less than half the GDP per capita than the USA.
- surgical_fire 11mo ago
  So what? GDP is a measurement of market value of goods and services. This hyperfocus on GDP is a societal disease, and all sorts of terrible policy derives from this hyperfocus. There's a nice public park on my neighborhood. It's a very scenic place, with a river going through it, with trees along its course, there's also a playground for kids with a large lawn area where people do picnics and relax around. Very pleasant place. That park generates 0 GDP. From a GDP standpoint, it would make more sense to remove the public park and turn it into a concrete hellscape for people to park their cars. Large cars preferably - huge SUVs or pickup trucks for that matter, no weakass economic cheap hybrids. GDP has to grow after all. And if that came to pass, the lives of everyone here would be miserable. But GDP would be higher, so that wins.
  - senordevnyc 11mo ago
    Hey, I didn’t pick the metric, I was just responding to someone who had. I’ve lived in both Europe and America, and if my personal situation allowed for it right now, I’d prefer to be in Europe. But I also do think GDP can be a useful metric, especially in the long run. I think Europe has great QoL, but I think it’s naive to not look at the growth rates of the major countries in the world and not be concerned about the long-term future of the European economy. Edit: you’re also wrong about the park. Someone paid to create it, and someone pays to maintain it. Both of those numbers show up in GDP.