9 ms·
Not bad with 16 GB VRAM, a bit disappointing on performance though, looking at the Blender 3D (open source) benchmarks: https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/
by samspenc 1y ago
Not bad with 16 GB VRAM, a bit disappointing on performance though, looking at the Blender 3D (open source) benchmarks: https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/query/?compute_type=OPTIX&compute_type=CUDA&compute_type=HIP&compute_type=METAL&compute_type=ONEAPI&group_by=device_name&blender_version=4.5.0 https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/query/?compute_type=...
It clocks in at 1503.4 samples per second, behind the NVidia RTX 2060 (1590.93 samples / sec, released Jan 2019), AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (1539, May 2022), and Apple M3 Pro GPU 14 cores (1651.85, Oct 2023).
Note that this perf comparison is just ray-tracing rendering, useful for games, but might give some clarity on performance comparisons with its competition.
- adgjlsfhk1 1y agoIt wouldn't surprise me if there was 10-20% perf improvement in drivers/software for this. Intel's architecture is pretty new and nothing is optimized for it yet.
- bee_rider 1y agoIs that a comparison of the raytracing fixed function hardware for the various GPUs, or is it a GPGPU comparison?
- Ekaros 1y agoI think note there against 2060 and 6750 XT is power efficiency. About half or quarter of TDP...