8 ms·
also, demonstrating a marked improvement in the experience. it really does seem like we all gonna be using jj soon enough I recall pijul.org that was another
by ysofunny 1y ago
also, demonstrating a marked improvement in the experience.
it really does seem like we all gonna be using jj soon enough
I recall pijul.org that was another working prototype of better git
and I wonder how much overlap is there in the way they have made the improvements.
- fiddlerwoaroof 1y agopijul uses a completely different model of version control than git (stores diffs rather than snapshots). And so the cost of switching and interoperation is a bit higher than jj which basically acts like a nice UI over git.
- ivanb 1y agoSupposedly, Pijul doesn't have the "force-push to trunk" problem. This alone makes it interesting.
- baq 1y agopijul is one of the projects that I’d just sponsor a team for a few years if I was a megacorp or a government research agency because it’s just so damn cool in theory, but has too many rough edges in day to day practice (IOW I’d like to try it but would need pijul colocate for it to make sense)
- hooper 1y agoJujutsu has "first class conflicts", but it's different from Pijul's "theory of patches". As far as I know, the other big stuff like "working copy is a commit" and the "operation log" (which allows for `jj undo`, safe concurrency, etc) is not present in Pijul. The approaches to Git interop are very different.