4 ms·
Texas is a big state. It’s lazy journalism to generalize the state as droughty, which is implied by that sentence. Lake Texoma has been hovering by the “full”
by AuthorizedCust 1y ago
Texas is a big state. It’s lazy journalism to generalize the state as droughty, which is implied by that sentence.
Lake Texoma has been hovering by the “full” mark pretty consistently for over 55 years. Recently, its water level has significantly declined to—wait for it—100% full!
If you monitor water maps, the east half of Texas’s water supplies don’t often get far outside of “full”.
More data: https://www.waterdatafortexas.org/reservoirs/individual/texoma https://www.waterdatafortexas.org/reservoirs/individual/texo...
- monero-xmr 1y agoAlso the water doesn’t disappear from the universe. It either evaporates or is pumped back out. People who lose their minds over water have been saying for 50 years we were about to enter a desert world
- tossandthrow 1y agoYou should definitely bring this attitude into the housing affordability discussion - remind people that they indeed can find cheap housing in rural Africa.
- ta20240528 1y agoThe Aral Sea says otherwise.
- rini17 1y agoClean water does disappear. Not from universe bit from places you need it most. That there's plenty of it in the air or sea or Saturn rings, is little consolation.
- scarab92 1y agoThese fabs don’t evaporate the water though, they use it as process water, and then treat it to wastewater standards before discharging to the municipal wastewater system. Assuming the municipality recycles their wastewater, which they would do in any drought prone region, this water will become clean water again. It’s essentially a closed system.
- rini17 1y ago> It’s essentially a closed system. Source? Especially the claim that they are using external municipal wastewater treatment seems highly implausible, they are using nasty chemicals.
- oceanhaiyang 1y agoI read they either dump it into a local river while monitoring it or back to water treatment plant. Some datacenters have started reusing water but for some reason using it more than once is not appealing. Definitely the biggest problem is it’s not always a closed system and dumping it into a river potentially damages the river and makes the area lose their water. A percentage of the water is also lost via evaporation. Source: https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-water-usage/ https://dgtlinfra.com/data-center-water-usage/
- rini17 1y agoDatacenters and fabs are different things.
- corranh 1y agoIt’s definitely not a closed system unless the water from the waste water treatment plant is pumped back upstream of the source of the municipal water which is not how most of these work.
- pfaphotoresist 1y ago> then treat it to wastewater standards before discharging to the municipal wastewater system. Are there PFAS chemicals in the semiconductor photoresist and then in the water? Do municipal wastewater standards require removal of PFAS? Similarly, they're all okay with dumping water used to wash out coal plants into the rivers: https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+10%25+coal+plant+wash+dump+in+river https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+10%25+coal+plant+wash+...
- ugh123 1y agoguy has never seen 'Waterworld'
- IshKebab 1y agoDo you really think that that's what the authors were thinking? You can't accuse people of not using their brains when you haven't engaged yours. Also you seem to be unaware of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overdrafting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overdrafting