8 ms·

I would love to read this and other material. Got links?

• bookofjoe 1y ago
  https://www.lesswrong.com/s/6uDBPacS6zDipqbZ9 https://www.lesswrong.com/s/6uDBPacS6zDipqbZ9 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/As7bjEAbNpidKx6LR/valence-series-1-introduction https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/As7bjEAbNpidKx6LR/valence-se... https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/73xBjgoHuiKvJ5WRk/intuitive-self-models-2-conscious-awareness https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/73xBjgoHuiKvJ5WRk/intuitive-... https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/JLZnSnJptzmPtSRTc/intuitive-self-models-8-rooting-out-free-will-intuitions https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/JLZnSnJptzmPtSRTc/intuitive-... https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/73xBjgoHuiKvJ5WRk/intuitive-self-models-2-conscious-awareness/comment/upFt8NQykdPgowQL9 https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/73xBjgoHuiKvJ5WRk/intuiti... Full disclosure: the links above were provided by Perplexity Pro. Caveat lector
  • quantadev 1y ago
    Another concept in this sort of realm is "Assembly Theory" by Lee Cronin. He's onto the right track with his "Causality Chain" concept, but it blows my mind he hasn't bought into the idea that with entanglement the entire chain might be a "signal carrier". He's 90% onto the right track. He just needs to realize the causality chain is "alive" at least in terms or probability waves, but as a chemist and not a Physicist he's probably afraid to delve too deeply into the realms of anything that smacks of retro-causation, even if it ever entered his mind.