6 ms·
TimeGuessr
- junon 1y ago30,592/50,000 is higher than I thought I'd get. This is fun! One of the photos was someone holding a phone with Timeguessr on it. Still managed to get the date wrong - it was taken in 2024.
- mmahemoff 1y agoThis is fun! I didn't immediately notice the time slider and thought it was just GeoGuessr with historical pictures, but the time element adds a whole new dimension.
- xeonmc 1y agoShould probably be renamed to “Spacetime Guesser”
- fcatalan 1y agoI do the timeguessr daily every day almost as a ritual, it's fun, satisfying and educative. It's also very interesting to watch people try after you've done it: how they catch on stuff you missed, their strategies to find and date things, or how they infuriatingly ignore whatever was the giveaway to you.
- justbeingbored 1y agoJust played 5 rounds. I wanted to see my score as ranked against others, but u didn't do that. That's like me saying here is 800 points for your post. There is no context for the score.
- gblargg 1y agoDoes it at least tell you how close you were for each one? (feedback so you can improve)
- fcatalan 1y agoYes there's a feedback page for each round explaining the pic and showing the location, also a breakdown page after every 5 round match.
- fcatalan 1y agoYes, score rankings are missing. There's a leaderboard for the daily, but only shows accounts you have friended. For reference, I tend to hover around 44k for the daily. 48k is a lucky/easy day, 40k some disaster happened. Under 40 is very rare. I like to think that would be above average, but without rankings I don't know :)
- xboxnolifes 1y agoThe context is how close you were to the correct answer, not to your peers.
- jen729w 1y agoI got ~28,000.
- cellis 1y agoindeed, this is screaming for a leaderboard and eventual Geoguesser. Sadly I do believe the reasoning models can one shot this? Maybe would take away all the fun
- me_bx 1y agoThe game 'Whentaken' [1] follows the exact same concept. Just mentioning in case people are interested in alternatives / slightly different UX. [1]: https://whentaken.com/ https://whentaken.com/
- eastbound 1y agoI find the UX of Whichyr much better, but it doesn’t have the geographical component. But you see your final ranking on a gaussian curve and it’s fun! https://whichyr.com/ https://whichyr.com/ And here are other games in that style of 5-minutes cultural guesses: https://framed.wtf/ https://framed.wtf/ https://gaps.wtf/ https://gaps.wtf/ https://sutom.nocle.fr/ https://sutom.nocle.fr/ https://globle.org/ https://globle.org/? https://worldlegame.io/ https://worldlegame.io/? https://flagle.gg/ https://flagle.gg/ https://phrazle.gg/ https://phrazle.gg/ https://numberle.org/ https://numberle.org/ Not working currently but guess a historical moment: https://www.historle.com/?# https://www.historle.com/?# Guess a wikipedia page: https://pedantle.certitudes.org https://pedantle.certitudes.org
- tasuki 1y agoI'm at 200 tries for the "Guess a wikipedia page" thing, completely exhausted, and not getting anywhere. Very frustrating, yet I can't bring myself to abandon it...
- mkl 1y agoTook me 115. I guessed lots of general filler words to work out the structure of some sentences, and guessed lots of general subject words to find a few hits. The grey words that it fills in when they're related can be a bit misleading. I didn't get a single sentence complete before guessing the article.
- tesuto 1y agoOut of curiosity, I wonder why the game chose Apple Maps. I would have expected OpenStreetMap. Interesting choice.
- mocmoc 1y agolove it
- stephenhandley 1y agoSuper fun! Would be cool to be able to challenge someone after going through a round. Also maybe clear CTA after round on way to sign up to save your score.
- ukprogrammer 1y agoGreat idea! What's the tech stack?
- alexkearns 1y agoNot quite the same but we created a timeline ordering game for US presidents: https://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/1842261/US-Presidents-Timeline-Game/ https://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/1842261/US-Presiden... You can also use our app to create timeline ordering games on subjects of your own choosing.
- nokita 1y agoIrretrievably hung my phone requiring a hard reset. Using Chrome on vanilla Android on Samsung.
- mh- 1y agoSeems like an issue with the OS? Surely a web page in a userland app like Chrome shouldn't be able to do that..
- brahma-dev 1y agoThis is how it renders for me. https://imgur.com/a/kJmNMUR https://imgur.com/a/kJmNMUR
- pastage 1y agoSome photos are off by at least 100 meters and it is surprising how easy a photo can be off a year so easily. I believe it happens because the easy timestamp is at the time of development, means you can easily be two years off. Also surprising how easy it is to get exact date and time of day on some of the photos.
- phgn 1y agoWhy do I have to pick both a location AND year? Why not focus this game on the year only?
- cheschire 1y agoYou’ll probably enjoy this game then https://whichyr.com/ https://whichyr.com/
- kaishiro 1y agoThat's like asking why a weather app needs both a date and city - the temperature on July 4th matters, but it's completely different in New York vs. Cairo. Same with this - the year sets the global context, but the location defines the local experience.
- cosmodev 1y agoI just clicked to take a quick look, and suddenly found myself playing it's a simple but surprisingly enjoyable game
- rossant 1y agoNice. Got 30,527.
- eej71 1y agoI got lucky - I got the Hagia Sophia twice.
- captn3m0 1y agoI couldn’t figure out how the time picker worked (and that there was a time picker) till the third round when I realised I was being penalized. Got 34k still.
- trebligdivad 1y agoI'm glad you figured it out...I don't see a map to put a pin into.
- Humphrey 1y agoThis is fun! While some are obvious, and some you need to "cheat" by Googling - it's really fun looking at a part of the world you wouldn't normally browse a map of.
- whamlastxmas 1y agoVery fun!
- golfer 1y agoCute game! Needs an easy way to maximize the picture so you can see it full screen (on laptop).
- Jordan-117 1y agoLove their selection of photos more than the competition -- more likely to contain giveaways like a famous location from an unusual angle or a subtle date, so it feels more like detective work than guesswork. Just wish it reset at midnight local.
- curtisszmania 1y ago[dead]
- king_phil 1y agoDid not work too well for me on mobile. One time it did not scroll but went back, one time controls were missing
- mh- 1y agoI didn't try the web based one, but the mobile app works great.
- setsewerd 1y agoYeah I had issues with the mobile web version as well. Worked for 4 rounds but then the time selector stopped moving when I tried to select, and the map stopped loading detail when zooming in (and wouldn't let me place a pin). Started over and the same thing happened in the 3rd round. Still a great little game though
- sundarurfriend 1y agoScrolling with the mouse on the image (no Ctrl or anything, just scroll) zooms into the section of the image you're on, for anyone else trying "Open image in new tab" or other ways to zoom in. I'm a big GeoGuessr fan, and had heard of TimeGuessr occasionally in those circles. I'd assumed it would be mostly pictures from the USA and so wasn't massively interested, and from trying it out now, I wasn't too far off: most of the images were from the US and Western Europe, and every single picture so far has been from a rich country. There are obvious reasons for that, and it's not a bad thing in some absolute terms, but it makes it kinda boring for me - the big appeal of GeoGuessr for me is that you routinely get dropped off in a country that you don't often think of, and momentarily get to see and imagine life through their eyes. Maybe over time, TimeGuessr will also accumulate images from more varied places - or maybe one of the alternatives mentioned in this thread (whentaken and whichyr) already do better in that regard?
- InitialLastName 1y agoI don't know, my pictures definitely biased towards "cameras are accessible in these places" but I had modern Nepal and Bangladesh, as well as 1930's Finland.
- NooneAtAll3 1y ago> Scrolling with the mouse once again nobody cares about laptop users :/
- baw-bag 1y agoIt's not that. They changed recently to 100% zoom. It used to be much more fine. Zoom in a little, Zoom out a little. For the past week, it's been max zoom in either direction. Kinda annoying.
- sundarurfriend 1y agoI myself am on a laptop actually :D but with a bluetooth mouse connected. Does yours not have two-finger drag on the touchpad be equivalent to a scroll? That also seems to work on this website, although of course it's a bit more inconvenient than using an actual mouse.
- pmxi 1y agoThis is really cool. However, my first photo said "Times Square, NY" in the corner, with a copyright for 1908 which gave it all away.
- SamBam 1y agoFun! I was surprised how often I was 1 year off and in the right city for things that I was just guessing about. On small error I found: there's a photo that's outside Piazza Navona in Rome in the 30s, which it lists as being 700 meters away at Piazza Venezia. I know I'm correct -- I lived a street away from there.
- hdjrudni 1y agoMaybe it moved 700m since the 30s? =)
- Arech 1y agoI absolutely love 3 dimensional nature of the game and how carefully many images are chosen to allow for a precise spacetime localization with a bit of a research. Super enjoyable experience in startling contrast with geogessr, which I don't even want to open. Thanks a ton!
- osigurdson 1y agoIt should be called "locationguessr" imo since that is what you are guessing.
- diego_moita 1y agoThere's an year slider on the bottom right. You're supposed to guess the year too.
- gandalfgreybeer 1y agoJust in case you enjoyed this, and based on you using “locationguessr”, I’d recommend looking up Geoguessr :)
- nisse72 1y agoI guessed 2021 for one photo which turned out to be Joe Biden's inauguration fireworks. It tells me I was 20 years off?
- elwell 1y agoThat was really fun; I was pleasantly surprised with 43,165. Trusting intuition worked well.
- wdutch 1y agoOh nicely done! There was me thinking I'd done well with 38,332 / 50,000. It'd be nice if the site itself showed how well you did relative to others but I can't see anything like that, maybe I'm missing it.
- INTPenis 1y agoIt wasn't really clear to me that you had to select the year as well as location. Because the year was already written in a red box, so I never tried to change it.
- oofnik 1y ago41,481. Nice. That was a fun time waster.
- breakyerself 1y agoThere was a chalkboard menu in the picture with the date on it, but it said I was 50 years off. Meta data isn't always reliable.