5 ms·
There is a good Veritasium episode on her last flight going deep into technical details of what went wrong: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTDFhWWPZ4Q https://
by a-r-t 1y ago
There is a good Veritasium episode on her last flight going deep into technical details of what went wrong:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTDFhWWPZ4Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTDFhWWPZ4Q
- homefree 1y agoYeah this was a great video, so many errors. The experienced navigator refusing to fly with her was correct, but I do wonder if he had been there if he would have been smart enough to save them.
- goodcanadian 1y agoProbably . . . from what I have read in the past, a better understanding of radio direction finding probably would have been enough to get them to Howland Island.
- dwheeler 1y agoYes, the Veritasium episode is great. In short: there's plenty of evidence Amelia Earhart was reckless. I'm sad that she paid with her life, but that is sometimes what happens when you're reckless while using dangerous machines.
- sokoloff 1y agoCaptain A. G. Lamplugh, a British pilot from the early days of aviation once famously said “Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”
- spankibalt 1y ago> Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. Yes, it is. Otherwise, "any carelessness, incapacity or neglect" wouldn't be so "terribly unforgiving".
- marcosdumay 1y agoIn car transit (like most things in life), you can do everything right and still die. In aviation, if you do everything right, you'll land safely.
- ephou7 1y agoThe two pilots in the Tenerife aircrash would beg to differ.
- gambiting 1y ago>> In aviation, if you do everything right, you'll land safely. The pilots who died in the 787 MAX crashes would disagree. They did everything exactly as they were trained to do and still crashed.
- david-gpu 1y ago> 787 MAX You are thinking of the 737 MAX [0]. There is no such thing as a 787 MAX yet [1]. [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_787_Dreamliner https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_787_Dreamliner
- gambiting 1y agoYes obviously, sorry that was a typo.
- krisoft 1y ago> In car transit (like most things in life), you can do everything right and still die. Same with aviation. The DHL Flight 611 over Überlingen, Iran Air Flight 655, Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752, American Airlines Flight 5342, Pan Am Flight 1736 are just the few easy ones which comes to mind immediately. > if you do everything right, you'll land safely. You. And the people who designed your aircraft. The people who maintain your aircraft. And the ATC. And other pilots. And the people on the ground operating anti-aircraft missiles.
- deepsun 1y agoYep, and how my instructor said, what's worse is that the sky can let you enjoy being careless 100 times and then punish.
- libraryatnight 1y agoThat's just life.
- HeyLaughingBoy 1y agoSame thing with farmers: it's usually the old, experienced farmers who die in dumb ways. They've been doing the same dangerous thing their whole lives and become complacent until it catches up with them.
- deepsun 1y agoInteresting, didn't know about farmers. Skydivers are the same, most accidents happen to experienced ones. But it's understandable, as adrenaline wears out with experience. Pilots typically are trained against that complacency, plus, as they say, everyone can be stupid for 15 minutes a day, plan for that. I found piloting pretty boring, if done right. Talk about soul-crushing.
- ToroToroTaxi 1y ago[flagged]