5 ms·

Considering AI is trained on the average human experience, I have a hard time believing it would be able to make any significant difference in this area. The be

Considering AI is trained on the average human experience, I have a hard time believing it would be able to make any significant difference in this area. The best experience I’ve had debugging at this level was using Microsoft’s time travel debugger which allows stepping forward and back.

userbinator 1y ago
[flagged]
- danb1974 1y ago
  That's not how averages work :)
  - FirmwareBurner 1y ago
    Yes, but we all understood the essence of what he meant and he's right. Why be a stickler about it.
    - deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]
    - userbinator 1y ago
      [flagged]
      - hhh 1y ago
        Is it brigading if people just have the opinion that AI can do well at software?
        userbinator 1y ago
        Only half of them.
- posnet 1y ago
  Median
  - spacechild1 1y ago
    Human intelligence roughly follows a normal distribution where the median is the same as the mean. In that sense OP was correct that half of the population are below average.
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
cjbprime 1y ago
You should try AI sometime. It's quite good, and can do things (like "analyze these 10000 functions and summarize what you found out about how this binary works, including adding comments everywhere) that individual humans do not scale to.
voidspark 1y ago
It can analyze a crash dump in 2 seconds, that could take hours for an experienced developer, or impossible for the "average human".
_i60b 1y ago
George Hotz's Qira is a timeless debugger; worth checking out too!