10 ms·
I agree, and I think most people would say the current models would rank low on creativity metrics however we define them. But to the main point, I don’t see ho
by pythonguython 1y ago
I agree, and I think most people would say the current models would rank low on creativity metrics however we define them. But to the main point, I don’t see how the quality we call creativity is unique to biological computing machines vs electronic computing machines. Maybe one day we’ll conclusively declare creativity to be a human trait only, but in 2025 that is not a closed question - however it is measured.
- Jensson 1y agoWe were talking about LLM here, not computing machines in general. LLM are trained to mimic not to produce novel things, so a person can easily think LLM wont get creative even though some computer program in the future could.
- signatoremo 1y ago> LLM are trained to mimic not to produce novel things Which LLM? That’s not the purpose of training for any model that I know of.
- namaria 1y agoTraining LLMs is literally finding sets of numbers that make them better at mimicking human language.