6 ms·

I moved from GitHub to self-hosted gitolite. I use a (standard) Makefile in each repo, which my deploy job runs (make test, make build, etc). I use githooks to

I moved from GitHub to self-hosted gitolite. I use a (standard) Makefile in each repo, which my deploy job runs (make test, make build, etc). I use githooks to do various automation. It's really not that much different to GH Actions, and not more work. But it's much faster, and easier to work with. If you're working in a team, then PRs are hard to replace.

Lyngbakr 2y ago
What drew you to gitolite over alternatives (e.g., Forgejo)?
fhd2 2y ago
My company is looking into a move from GitLab to https://forgejo.org https://forgejo.org (Codeberg, essentially). Seems way easier to self host. Seems fine so much for all my team's needs.
- archerx 2y ago
  This looks interesting, I have self hosted gitlab but it is so slow and I don't need most of the features it offers. Thanks for sharing!
- homebrewer 2y ago
  Yeah, we've been using gitea for five years, and from administrator's point of view it's one of the easiest things to self host. Updates can happen automatically and require very little downtime, and it's light on server resources. In comparison, Gitlab was a massive pain and became close to unusable on that same server before we migrated to gitea, even though Gitlab was used just for code hosting, and gitea is used for everything it supports (container image and package repositories, issues, etc).
sirolimus 2y ago
Why not gitea?
baq 2y ago
For code review and merge workflow gerrit used to be good a decade ago, it's probably good today, too. Github PRs are strictly worse today than what I remember from gerrit back then.
- Jolter 2y ago
  Gerrit is great if your team is willing to work in a rebase based workflow! We handled huge repos on Gerrit (and a huge number of them) at my previous employer with very few problems. It does take a certain effort to self-host it, but then what doesn't.
greensh 2y ago
what advantage does gitlolite over gitea? If i wanted to replace GitHub my intuition would be to replace it with gitea. It seems to have similar interface, pull requests, workers etc to gh.
- oefrha 2y ago
  Gitolite is a bare bones git server. Gitea is a forge. They’re not remotely in the same class of software. Gitolite doesn’t even have a web view for the repos, you need a separate package like cgit for that; never mind project management features.
MathMonkeyMan 2y ago
On my first team in 2011 we used Phabricator before the company sprung for github enterprise. Phabricator was fine; you could even just copy/paste the output of `git diff` into a form on the UI as an alternative to pushing to a monitored branch.

Lyngbakr 2y ago

What drew you to gitolite over alternatives (e.g., Forgejo)?

fhd2 2y ago

My company is looking into a move from GitLab to https://forgejo.org https://forgejo.org (Codeberg, essentially). Seems way easier to self host. Seems fine so much for all my team's needs.

archerx 2y ago
This looks interesting, I have self hosted gitlab but it is so slow and I don't need most of the features it offers. Thanks for sharing!
homebrewer 2y ago
Yeah, we've been using gitea for five years, and from administrator's point of view it's one of the easiest things to self host. Updates can happen automatically and require very little downtime, and it's light on server resources. In comparison, Gitlab was a massive pain and became close to unusable on that same server before we migrated to gitea, even though Gitlab was used just for code hosting, and gitea is used for everything it supports (container image and package repositories, issues, etc).

sirolimus 2y ago

Why not gitea?

baq 2y ago

For code review and merge workflow gerrit used to be good a decade ago, it's probably good today, too. Github PRs are strictly worse today than what I remember from gerrit back then.

Jolter 2y ago
Gerrit is great if your team is willing to work in a rebase based workflow! We handled huge repos on Gerrit (and a huge number of them) at my previous employer with very few problems. It does take a certain effort to self-host it, but then what doesn't.

greensh 2y ago

what advantage does gitlolite over gitea? If i wanted to replace GitHub my intuition would be to replace it with gitea. It seems to have similar interface, pull requests, workers etc to gh.

oefrha 2y ago
Gitolite is a bare bones git server. Gitea is a forge. They’re not remotely in the same class of software. Gitolite doesn’t even have a web view for the repos, you need a separate package like cgit for that; never mind project management features.

MathMonkeyMan 2y ago

On my first team in 2011 we used Phabricator before the company sprung for github enterprise. Phabricator was fine; you could even just copy/paste the output of `git diff` into a form on the UI as an alternative to pushing to a monitored branch.