4 ms·
Why $6,2999 when the article says he payed around $900?
by DLoupe 2y ago
Why $6,2999 when the article says he payed around $900?
- tobyhinloopen 2y agoHe likely bought an old model second-hand :) Edit: The camera he uses is a 2019 pocket camera. The 6299 must be another model that has the same restrictions.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- phony-account 2y ago> Why $6,2999 when the article says he payed around $900? In the fifth paragraph: “Admittedly, it did not cost me the $6300 from the article's title, much closer to $900. Nonetheless, everything I'm describing translates to every other Canon camera model!”
- gunian 2y ago[flagged]
- _dabs 2y agoWhat tha hell
- thatBilly 2y agoHe discovered this information about his $900 camera but has found that it also applies to other models, likely the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III.
- KomoD 2y agoBecause it gets more clicks.