5 ms·

What makes you say that?

• throwaway314155 2y ago
  They hyped them like crazy and haven't discussed them once since then. I agree that the inability to change the model is pretty absurd when the whole point was to "supercharge" specific tasks. There was even talk of some sort of profit sharing with creators which clearly never happened. I just think the premise is too confusing for many and can still be served by using a custom system prompt via the API.
  • coffeebeqn 2y ago
    Was it hyped? I tried a few of them and they seemed absolutely useless. Like I could install a “custom GPT” that just appends something to my prompt? How great..
    • ionwake 2y ago
      No the whole Point is you make a gpt for yourself and upload all your related documents to it and then query that. It performs 10x better than a generic query without attaching every single doc that could be relevant. I am unsure if the answer is to use “projects” maybe this has superseded myGpts? I am perplexed why HN isn’t focusing on this issue as all the Llm gains I’ve ever had were wit highly customised personal myGpts. I can understand OpenAI and Sam’s having access to their own models may not even know what the best way to use the released stuff is Ps - typing on my phone hence typos
      • asdff 2y ago
        This is something being done but not for consumers right now. On a more roll your own basis. I know a few people whose companies have already established their own gpt trained on their own internal codebase, standards, documentation, and I’m sure relevant reference information as well. Think big r and d companies in stem.