7 ms·
I looked at the website and have no idea how Arc is supposed to be AGI. Can someone explain?
by bashfulpup 2y ago
I looked at the website and have no idea how Arc is supposed to be AGI.
Can someone explain?
- TheDudeMan 2y agoIt is necessary but not sufficient. If you can't do ARC, you aren't general enough. But even if you can do ARC, you still might not be general enough.
- Workaccount2 2y agoIt's also possible that you are an AGI and simply cannot pass ARC.
- TheDudeMan 2y agoHow so? If there is a task that humans can do but the AI cannot, I would not call it AGI. But that's just my definition.
- awwaiid 2y agoYeah but if my brother can't pass it, that doesn't mean he is NOT human.
- Jensson 2y agoCould he pass it if he was educated to do the task from birth? Human level intelligence includes being able to be educated, the ML models we have done so far can't be educated so have to match the level of educated humans to compare. General intelligence as we know it requires ability to receive education.
- infgeoax 2y agoIsn't chatGPT already proven to be smarter than many of us in many ways?
- TheDudeMan 2y agoI said AGI. I did not say human.
- biophysboy 2y agoIts not a test of AGI. It tests whether you possess innate human capacities: rudimentary arithmetic & geometry, etc. Most of the problems were created manually. The original paper states that they limited the test to innate human priors to make the scope well-defined.