5 ms·
Yes, but he tested for likelihood of lung cancer through gene screening. Odds we favourable so he kept smoking.
by nbar 2y ago
Yes, but he tested for likelihood of lung cancer through gene screening. Odds we favourable so he kept smoking.
- cinntaile 2y agoI can't tell if you're joking or not but that's an interesting approach for sure. I'm surprised gene screening was accurate enough to do that 20-40 years ago?
- earnesti 2y agoLOL. I think he was an idiot, in that regards. Similarities to Steve Jobs, who resorted to quackery with his cancer. People can be geniuses and dumbasses at the same time.
- sk11001 2y agoI don't see the quackery, man liked smoking so he kept smoking. I think you're assuming some stronger claim about smoking or genetics which nobody has made.
- jodrellblank 2y agoWhat about giving cancer to others by secondary smoke inhalation, what about tongue cancer and mouth cancer and gum disease and cardio-vascular problems and breathing difficulties and eventual COPD and all the negatives of smoking that aren’t lung cancer?