11 ms·
I think this is the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043 https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043
by ylem 2y ago
I think this is the paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043 https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043
- ben_w 2y ago> Our estimate is only about 20% of citers read the original Oh no That's basically the same as the percentage of people who read news stories when responding to or sharing the headline
- ta988 2y agoReally we do have numbers on that?
- ben_w 2y agoHere's an irony for you: This link: https://insights.rkconnect.com/5-roles-of-the-headline-and-why-they-matter https://insights.rkconnect.com/5-roles-of-the-headline-and-w... says "Only 22% only read the headline of an online news story, according to data from the Rueters Institue for the Study of Journalism." But following the link to that study gets me to https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/fil... which… if it supports that claim, I can't seem to find where :P
- ta988 2y agoI love it. Thanks!
- ta988 2y agoThat's the one. Tbere is also https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323202394_Opinion_Mutations_of_citations https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323202394_Opinion_M... and there was yet another one but I can't find it