12 ms·
Why are there so many links to irrelevant wikipedia links, such as [wood], [woman], and [boon]? Did they just run a software to tag every noun with a wikipedia
by qrian 2y ago
Why are there so many links to irrelevant wikipedia links, such as [wood], [woman], and [boon]? Did they just run a software to tag every noun with a wikipedia article?
- rahkiin 2y agoThey’re giving Wikipedia the hard-needed inlinks for search engines.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- OJFord 2y agoSometimes I wish Wikipedia would get more JS-y, and have no hyperlinks as such in text, but you could click on any word (or something) to go to page if it has one. Because I've had this the other way around too, where it's not linked and I have to go there myself because I actually do want it. (And that can also be because the word was linked elsewhere on the page.)
- Our_Benefactors 2y agoSeriously, I want to see those wooden IBM product mockups and ordered xenon, not a Wikipedia article on wood.