7 ms·
Well, such an optimistic title, considering that greenhouse gases are excluded in the article.
by jereze 2y ago
Well, such an optimistic title, considering that greenhouse gases are excluded in the article.
- bryanlarsen 2y agoGreenhouse gases will most likely peak in 2024, but 2023 & 2025 are also probable. https://climateanalytics.org/comment/will-2024-be-the-year-emissions-start-falling https://climateanalytics.org/comment/will-2024-be-the-year-e...
- hackerlight 2y agoNo they won't. Only the first derivative of greenhouse gases ('emissions') will peak. Greenhouse gases itself will only peak after the world achieves net-zero.
- bryanlarsen 2y agoSince you're being pedantic, greenhouse gases don't have an infinite lifetime in the atmosphere so they will start going down slightly before we hit net-zero. I hope most understood that I meant to say peak greenhouse gas emissions.
- jereze 2y agoEven if we are close to peaking emissions, we must consider the phenomenon of accumulation. Given that CO2 has an effective lifespan of around 100 years and methane about 10 years in the atmosphere, reductions in emissions now will still result in these gases accumulating and impacting the climate for decades to come.
- hollerith 2y agoWhere you have "accumulating", you mean persisting.
- voxelghost 2y agoNo, even if you emit less, you are still 'accumulating', but at a slower rate. And previously released methane is still converting to co2 in the atmosphere, for decades to come.
- hollerith 2y agoOK. It's too late for me to retract my comment, though.
- marcosdumay 2y agoIf you cut all methane emissions right now, the Earth would immediately start to cool down, and do it for a decade or 2. That is half-lives work.
- AtlasBarfed 2y agoYou mean the growth of emission rates. Emissions will still be ongoing for a looooong time.
- yen223 2y agoWe aren't allowed to celebrate any victories anymore?
- kersplody 2y agoAnd ironically decreasing coal and fuel pollution decreases albedo causing faster warming which will persist for a few decades until things balance out. Less pollution is good, particularly when it comes to reductions in sulphur dioxide from bunker fuel and PM2.5 from coal emissions, but it does have side effects amounting to a couple of degrees Celsius of warming according to recent papers. Hanson's "Global Warming in the Pipeline" is a sobering read.