7 ms·

When I use Raspberry Pi OS in a Raspberry Pi 4, 8GB of RAM - I feel I already have an excellent, refreshingly stable, late-90s-era experience. It scratches that

• contrarian1234 2y ago
  I used 8GB RAM till recently and I've found it more and more untenable. The primary issue is the browser. Even now on 16GB I restart Firefox every couple of days. But other things also eat RAM like crazy Running Emacs/Cider I'd have to kill other apps and reboot my REPL a couple times a day. Emacs would also leak memory and need a restart every couple of days
  • yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
    Really? I can only hold one firefox session at a time in 8GB of RAM, but I've always assumed that's because I keep an unreasonable number of active+background tabs open.
  • grimgrin 2y ago
    i wish firefox had more granularity with its tab unloading feature. one method is restarting browser. but by default it’ll unload tabs if you’re low on memory. you can force em in about:unloads (hint- about:about if you ever forget) i wrote a simple firefox extension that unloads em all with a button click, but it’s no different than restarting ff or spamming clicks in :unloads
    • sitkack 2y ago
      We already know the solution. We run the browser in Wasm inside the browser. That way it only has one tab open and that tab is doing 99% of its work inside of a wasm env. I thought firefox would ship new versions of firefox inside of firefox at some point. I guess that point is still in the future. This of course is how electron should work as well. A canvas only frame that loads whatever rendering system you want, which could be a browser, or it could be Unreal engine.
      • ale42 2y ago
        Isn't this what SDL (https://www.libsdl.org/ https://www.libsdl.org/) is for? Some cross-platform (and pretty light) hardware abstraction where you can have a canvas, do 3D, audio, whatever...
      • imiric 2y ago
        I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not, but assuming it's not... How many levels of abstraction do we need to run software reliably? The fact that browsers have effectively become operating systems should be worrying enough. No wonder we have all these fantasy projects that take us back to when our computing environments were actually pleasant to use. I would partly blame the invasive tracking and needless complexity of modern OSs for that, but the ever growing software layers around hardware makes no sense at all. We should question any such design decision, and strive to simplify this ball of complexity instead.
    • adhamsalama 2y ago
      Try Sidebery extension.
    • beagle3 2y ago
      There’s AutoTabDiscard which lets you set a timeout and other rules for when to discard.
      • user_7832 2y ago
        Is AutoTabDiscard still helpful/necessary with whatever automatic stuff Chrome/Firefox does nowadays? I run a lot of tabs (100s-1000s) and this sounds potentially very helpful if it does something beyond what the browser automatically does.
        • beagle3 2y ago
          I think Firefox will delay loading on session resume (that is, if you restart Firefox, tabs will not load until you actually switch to them),but will not unload anything automatically - so if you open 200 tabs between restarts and keep them open (which I sometimes do, for a week or two until I close them) it makes a difference.
          • grimgrin 2y ago
            If you toggle this it will automatically unload, thought I'm not sure how low memory has to get before it triggers: browser.tabs.unloadOnLowMemory In my original comment above I wrongly assumed it _was_ on by default
  • persnickety 2y ago
    12GiB and copious swap. 4 profiles open with 50-100 tabs loaded at any time. The only problem is the accumulation of CPU use from web apps. Consider adding more swap space so that older tabs have an out-of-the-way place to stay.
  • cabby 2y ago
    'Auto Tab Discard' was a game changer for me using firefox. I was about to upgrade to a 64gb laptop.
    • contrarian1234 2y ago
      it helps but strangely doesn't eliminate the problem entirely
      • cabby 2y ago
        Perhaps I don't see it on 32gb but can relate with cider/emacs.
  • prmoustache 2y ago
    I guess the primary issue is the chair-->keyboard interface. The fact that browsers can open unlimited number of tabs doesn't mean you don't have to do a little housekeeping. Plenty of people still use systems with 4GB and lower and it works fine as long as the number of tabs they open is limited.
    • contrarian1234 2y ago
      The primary issue is that browser developers are people that can afford kitted out Macbook pros so the system isn't designed to scale to small/weak systems :)) I don't believe a browser couldn't be designed to have a small RAM footprint. All my tabs could be suspended and saved to disk when in the background (and not spinning any tasks). They can be read back into RAM near instantly when I tab back to them
      • nolist_policy 2y ago
        No, Firefox and/or raspberryos just not well engineered for this usecase. My Chromebook with 8Gb ram has dozens of tabs and web apps open in Chrome, runs one VM with Android and another VM with Linux in turn running Firefox and more. All without breaking a sweat.
        • layer8 2y ago
          I run Firefox on 8 GB without any trouble whatsoever. But I also rarely open more than a dozen tabs.
          • beagle3 2y ago
            I use Firefox on an 8GB, early 2013 MBP, with hundreds of tabs and an extension, AutoTabDiscard that unloads/suspends them after a couple of hours. Works beautifully. I have to restart the computer about once a month because of Catalina bugs, but Firefox is super stable.
            • 2y ago
  • safety1st 2y ago
    [flagged]
  • graemep 2y ago
    NoScript and only turn on JS when required, and only for the site itself. Hugely reduces memory requirements
• cxr 2y ago
  > 8GB of RAM [...] late-90s-era experience Not even close.
  • p0w3n3d 2y ago
    I started my studies on 2003 and highest I could do was 768MB of RAM. I remember this amount exactly, because my LL(1) grammar compiler was leaking memory on my pre-presentation test, and I had to present it to pass the course. Every MB of memory counted, and it started swapping. I was praying to make it pass but when the amount of swap increased above the amount of RAM I gave up. However I was last in the queue to present, and the teacher told me he needs to go, as it was too late. I was so happy I barely could hold my laugh. Came to my dorm and fixed it next day. Core memory. That's how I also fell in love with my wife :D She was doing the extreme programming with me
  • ddtaylor 2y ago
    Moat of us had about 16 or 32mb at the time IIRC
    • toddmorey 2y ago
      Unless you had RAMDoubler(TM)! Remember that?!
• pjmlp 2y ago
  Not even close, if you told that about a ESP32 based system then I would have agreed. My 2003 bought multimedia Athlon XP desktop had 512 MB!
  • ale42 2y ago
    The PC I was using in the late 90s had probably 32 MB of RAM after an upgrade... when I built a PC (2001?) with 512 MB it was looking like an infinite amount of RAM...
    • rvense 2y ago
      I remember just laughing when I heard that Adobe had fixed a bug that occurred when running Photoshop in more than 1GB RAM on Mac OS 9. It seemed like such a theoretical thing to have that much memory.
  • esbeeb 2y ago
    Zoom alone takes 2.4GB of RAM, just after being launched and starting a meeting - and no-one's even joined the meeting yet.
• prmoustache 2y ago
  You weren't born in that late 90's era right? :D
  • esbeeb 2y ago
    Correct. 70's
• seanc 2y ago
  While all those pointing out that 8GB of RAM was mainframe stuff in the 90's are absolutely correct, I would offer that the software bloat between 90's software and modern software does make the _experience_ roughly comparable. Except for the built-in HDMI video and the seamless plug-n-play networking that is...
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]