6 ms·
IMO, Leaked is probably the better word here. Equifax did not steal the data in the first place either, they recorded/copied it from other sources which leaked
by drewmol 3y ago
IMO, Leaked is probably the better word here. Equifax did not steal the data in the first place either, they recorded/copied it from other sources which leaked or sold it to them.
- g051051 3y ago> other sources which leaked or sold it to them. Every data source (such as a bank or credit card) provides that data to CRAs because consumers granted permission to do so when entering into a business relationship. Either that, or it's publicly available data purchased from aggregators.
- Arrath 3y ago> because consumers granted permission to do so when entering into a business relationship Do we have an actual choice?
- lazide 3y agoYou could not get a loan or credit, I guess. There are costs to that approach, of course.
- smaudet 3y agoWildly unfeasible. The consumer does not have a choice, they do not have an ability to live within their means without incurring credit checks. Take housing - perhaps it is possible to purchase outright a home with cash, however you will not find generally anyone willing to take payment in cash. If you cannot afford that and are not taking a loan, then you must rent. However you cannot rent without a credit score. So no the consumer did not consent to anything. This is a ridiculous and dishonest viewpoint.
- lazide 3y agoHow did you get that from what I wrote? And notably, it’s entirely possible to rent without a credit check. Just not big corp places. My current place didn’t check my credit, and they weren’t the only ones. I was disappointed they didn’t. But a lot of the cookie cutter places will.