7 ms·
Why not?
by Michiel 14y ago
Why not?
- dsirijus 14y agoBecause in most of those mails it was mission critical that I receive the response. The process grinds to a halt if I don't receive response, irregardless of anyone and anything else. Both Alex and I were tied to the same process and action. The priority of it is unchanged.
- csallen 14y agoThis doesn't mean that recipients can't feel additional pressure to respond due to the presence of another party.
- insertnickname 14y ago"Irregardless" is a double negative (and not a proper English word).
- dsirijus 14y agoYes and no to that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless