6 ms·
That's what books were for (among other things): they were knowledge prosthetics. EDIT: And to be clear, yes, books were conveying information from other adult
by HuShifang 3y ago
That's what books were for (among other things): they were knowledge prosthetics.
EDIT: And to be clear, yes, books were conveying information from other adults. But 1) the capital requirements of engaging or operating a printing press meant that there was some gatekeeping (for better as well as worse) concerning which adults' views made it into print, and 2) there were things like peer review and other social technologies to increase confidence in the accuracy of the information contained in books, i.e. to make that gatekeeping more than merely economic. LLMs are ingesting the unfiltered thoughts of anyone with internet access, and then noisily producing outputs based on them (with some limited inexpert human fine-tuning at the end).
- scotty79 3y agoNot all kids were encouraged to engage with books. I don't think LLMs are a replacement for books. But they might be a decent replacement for fallible human that read some books in the past and vaguely remembers some of them.