6 ms·

The discussion moved to talking about is competing with mature nodes, where you said they'd only be competing with themselves (which doesn't seem to be right).

• cubefox 3y ago
  Well, it's right for the leading edge. The point is that they will stop scaling chips before technical limits are reached.
  • throwawaylinux 3y ago
    > Well, it's right for the leading edge. No, the point was that the leading edge will stop advancing when it can no longer compete economically with companies that sell mature nodes. Which is obvious, but I was just being similarly reductive. > The point is that they will stop scaling chips before technical limits are reached. Sure, like most commercial ventures, cost becomes prohibitive at some point and overtakes benefits. As it always has been.
    • cubefox 3y ago
      > No, the point was that the leading edge will stop advancing when it can no longer compete economically with companies that sell mature nodes. The "mature node" here will just be the one before the first node that doesn't make economic sense anymore. And this will be from a leading edge company, most likely TSMC. Say, if 2nm is too expensive compared to 3nm, then TSMC will stick with 3nm.
      • throwawaylinux 3y ago
        Yep.