The article is basically trash. If anything the content of the article is the opposite of the headline. To me, on a 50+ year time frame, the rupee is more inte

The article is basically trash. If anything the content of the article is the opposite of the headline. To me, on a 50+ year time frame, the rupee is more interesting than any of the 4 mentioned. I was just thinking yesterday how if 1989 in China went differently that the dollar right now could be in trouble. Lula's currency is pretty laughable. A currency that you share with Argentina? What could possibly go wrong?