7 ms·

One wonders if eventually - historians will plug all the content from a person's personal notes, their diary, their chat logs, into an LLM, and perform research

One wonders if eventually - historians will plug all the content from a person's personal notes, their diary, their chat logs, into an LLM, and perform research by talking to the AI about the person's life? If you trained an LLM against all the recorded discussions of Einstein - is it that different from talking to Einstein himself?

whitemary 3y ago
See Black Mirror S02E01 (it doesn't work out very well)
- sharemywin 3y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Click_(2006_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Click_(2006_film) not quite the same but putting your self on auto pilot seems possible with something like this.
obblekk 3y ago
One level further: the historian asking questions is itself an AI meaning as soon as primary sources are provided, interesting history insights flow out.
ent101 3y ago
"If you trained an LLM against all the recorded discussions of Einstein - is it that different from talking to Einstein himself?" Yes, his daily visual, touch, hearing, smelling, readings... perceptions will be missing from the model.
- default_png 3y ago
  Meh, Just Mock thoes in later.
ghaff 3y ago
Probably yes. But doesn't sound that different in principle from the memory room in Scalzi's Interdependency series.
sharemywin 3y ago
somebodies had to a have already tried this on here... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.innersloth.spacemafia&hl=en_US&gl=US&pli=1 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.innersloth...
MayeulC 3y ago
In theory, you may be able to ask the LLM about the person's life, as if it was the person, but you won't get more facts out than you provide as input. It may still make up credible info. Regarding your last question, it wil lack an enormous ammount of data that make up a person's experience. Moreover, talking to sound like <X> isn't the same as thinking like <X>. It reminds me of the later part of the book Accelerando, where synthetic personalities made up from historical records (could be anyone from Cleopatra to Newton) keep being reincarnated in a near, post-singularity future. They are handed out an FAQ that tries to bring them up-to-date on the current state of affairs.
goodpoint 3y ago
> If you trained an LLM against all the recorded discussions of Einstein - is it that different from talking to Einstein himself? The fact that an LLM does not have the ability to think and understand things is a bit of a giveaway.
45ure 3y ago
AI21 Labs tried to replicate the style of late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg based on her legal writings and failed, at least for now. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ai/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/14/ruth-ba...
carlosjobim 3y ago
Of course you can not do any research - discover new things - by doing this. The AI can only repeat what it has been fed or make up lies. You cannot discover new material by using AI.

whitemary 3y ago

See Black Mirror S02E01 (it doesn't work out very well)

sharemywin 3y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Click_(2006_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Click_(2006_film) not quite the same but putting your self on auto pilot seems possible with something like this.

obblekk 3y ago

One level further: the historian asking questions is itself an AI meaning as soon as primary sources are provided, interesting history insights flow out.

ent101 3y ago

"If you trained an LLM against all the recorded discussions of Einstein - is it that different from talking to Einstein himself?" Yes, his daily visual, touch, hearing, smelling, readings... perceptions will be missing from the model.

default_png 3y ago
Meh, Just Mock thoes in later.

ghaff 3y ago

Probably yes. But doesn't sound that different in principle from the memory room in Scalzi's Interdependency series.

sharemywin 3y ago

somebodies had to a have already tried this on here... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.innersloth.spacemafia&hl=en_US&gl=US&pli=1 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.innersloth...

MayeulC 3y ago

In theory, you may be able to ask the LLM about the person's life, as if it was the person, but you won't get more facts out than you provide as input. It may still make up credible info. Regarding your last question, it wil lack an enormous ammount of data that make up a person's experience. Moreover, talking to sound like <X> isn't the same as thinking like <X>. It reminds me of the later part of the book Accelerando, where synthetic personalities made up from historical records (could be anyone from Cleopatra to Newton) keep being reincarnated in a near, post-singularity future. They are handed out an FAQ that tries to bring them up-to-date on the current state of affairs.

goodpoint 3y ago

> If you trained an LLM against all the recorded discussions of Einstein - is it that different from talking to Einstein himself? The fact that an LLM does not have the ability to think and understand things is a bit of a giveaway.

45ure 3y ago

AI21 Labs tried to replicate the style of late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg based on her legal writings and failed, at least for now. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/14/ruth-bader-ginsburg-ai/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/14/ruth-ba...

carlosjobim 3y ago

Of course you can not do any research - discover new things - by doing this. The AI can only repeat what it has been fed or make up lies. You cannot discover new material by using AI.