4 ms·

Why would you start a company that is entirely dependent on a third party’s closed product, over which you have zero control? This just feels immensely risky.

RivieraKid 4y ago
Starting a company is risky. If everyone thinks like you, it creates an opportunity to create a product that doesn't exist. And yes, there's a risk.
- mritchie712 4y ago
  Competition and progress on infra will drive the cost down over time. OpenAI won't be the only show in town. It will become like thinking it's a risk to build on AWS.
fragsworth 4y ago
It's the only service available that does this and you want to get ahead of it. Presumably, some competitors will show up and you should be able to switch. Prices will go down as competition pops up and they make things more efficient.
zamnos 4y ago
Realistically, if you start a business, there are tons of such dependencies. If that's too scary for you, you're probably too risk adverse to be an entrepreneur.
- unclad5968 4y ago
  All those dependencies usually have alternatives though
- esperent 4y ago
  The issue is not having dependencies. The issue is having one specific dependency that is a beta experimental product with no viable alternative, and which will tank your company when they raise prices. Your company must always have alternatives for all third party services. The only exception is open source software that you could switch to hosting yourself if the SAAS company shuts down.
- bfeynman 4y ago
  Shocking that you are able to even get investors with such a crude view on how business works. Starting an ancillary business related to one product that is not even your own IP or core competency is just lightweight consultancy, not a start up.
  - rchaud 4y ago
    I would have thought the goal of sharecropping on OpenAI's land was to build a product that OpenAI would eventually acquire.
    - bfeynman 4y ago
      The product is entirely just OpenAI. IMO they would only be in the acquisition part to acquire the customer base, nothing about the product. But then they couldn't have another company paying to do the same thing. Why acquire one portfolio when you have _n_ companies paying them to offer same thing to others.
- ilaksh 4y ago
  I don't know how to get $78,000 and it's asinine that you would assume that isn't a hurdle for anyone.

RivieraKid 4y ago

Starting a company is risky. If everyone thinks like you, it creates an opportunity to create a product that doesn't exist. And yes, there's a risk.

mritchie712 4y ago
Competition and progress on infra will drive the cost down over time. OpenAI won't be the only show in town. It will become like thinking it's a risk to build on AWS.

fragsworth 4y ago

It's the only service available that does this and you want to get ahead of it. Presumably, some competitors will show up and you should be able to switch. Prices will go down as competition pops up and they make things more efficient.

zamnos 4y ago

Realistically, if you start a business, there are tons of such dependencies. If that's too scary for you, you're probably too risk adverse to be an entrepreneur.

unclad5968 4y ago
All those dependencies usually have alternatives though
esperent 4y ago
The issue is not having dependencies. The issue is having one specific dependency that is a beta experimental product with no viable alternative, and which will tank your company when they raise prices. Your company must always have alternatives for all third party services. The only exception is open source software that you could switch to hosting yourself if the SAAS company shuts down.
bfeynman 4y ago
Shocking that you are able to even get investors with such a crude view on how business works. Starting an ancillary business related to one product that is not even your own IP or core competency is just lightweight consultancy, not a start up.
- rchaud 4y ago
  I would have thought the goal of sharecropping on OpenAI's land was to build a product that OpenAI would eventually acquire.
  - bfeynman 4y ago
    The product is entirely just OpenAI. IMO they would only be in the acquisition part to acquire the customer base, nothing about the product. But then they couldn't have another company paying to do the same thing. Why acquire one portfolio when you have _n_ companies paying them to offer same thing to others.
ilaksh 4y ago
I don't know how to get $78,000 and it's asinine that you would assume that isn't a hurdle for anyone.