5 ms·
The second half of paragraph 2 on page 7 of the brief: >And no foreign state has supported NSO’s claim to immunity; indeed, NSO has not even identified the sta
by Seam0nkey 4y ago
The second half of paragraph 2 on page 7 of the brief:
>And no foreign state has supported NSO’s claim to immunity; indeed, NSO has not even identified the states for which it claims to have acted as an agent.
- encryptluks2 4y ago
- tptacek 4y agoMaybe you should say the quiet part out loud, instead of having us guess at what you mean by the innuendo.
- mwerd 4y agoIsrael, where NSO group is headquartered, surely.
- compsciphd 4y agoexcept, that's probably not their claim. their claim is that they are agents for their client states (which in none (or at least the vast majority) of the publicized cases) has been Israel. i.e. it was state sponsored espionage, where they were the state's agent (be it saudi, or any other state). Personally, I don't see how this claim works, if a foreign govt pays someone to spy, that person still goes to jail if they get caught. also as the justice dept came out against their claim, it would seem they dont really have much of anyone "in their pocket".