5 ms·
Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
- themodelplumber 4y agoThis is great to see in a way, as it seems to show that Elon is interested in access to both sides of party lines. If a true area of focus it's probably good news for his businesses and their sustainability as we enter a stronger-gov, stronger-regs environment in the US.
- CurtHagenlocher 4y agoGrifter "visionaries" with messiah complexes can indeed find common ground across "party lines".
- leobg 4y ago'The vanity of others bothers us only when it runs counter to our own.' —Nietzsche
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- chatterhead 4y agoElon is wrong about blockchain Twitter. IPFS + Blockchain + Starlink + Twitter = censorship-proof Web3.0. I could be wrong.
- encryptluks2 4y agoIs access to money to pay for Twitter, Starlink and cryptocurrency not considered censorship of those unable to afford it?
- chatterhead 4y agoNo. It's not. Why would you think it would be?
- encryptluks2 4y agoBecause those people do not have access to something that someone is stating as censorship resistant, when in fact not having access to the funds to pay for something is in fact suppressing people with alternative views that cannot otherwise participate.
- chatterhead 4y agoHow about read-only free; comment-cost? Would that be fair? That way truth can permeate their world, but shaping it requires payment?
- encryptluks2 4y agoNo... If people can't participate then it is a form of censorship.
- smoldesu 4y agoIf you think that people are going to pay money to tell you the truth, then you must have been asleep for the past week of "Verified" madness on Twitter.