11 ms·

I have been following these events for months, and I have come to the exact opposite conclusion. First, the United States cannot win a war against both Russia a

I have been following these events for months, and I have come to the exact opposite conclusion. First, the United States cannot win a war against both Russia and China at the same time. Second, Europe is starting to crack: see the protests in the Germany and Czech Republic. Expect to see one major EU country leave NATO and the EU this winter. All Russia has to do to break up Europe is to keep playing hardball with energy for another six months. EDIT: thanks for the downvotes. I'm sorry that truth-seeking bothers you <shrug>

NicoJuicy 4y ago
Based on what? Russia's GDP deprecated and the area they need to control is too big for them to handle. Eg. Just look at the CSTO
nocoiner 4y ago
> Expect to see one major EU country leave NATO and the EU this winter. I’d be interested in taking the other side of this wager, quite possibly at even money odds depending on nailing down specifics. Would you care to discuss definitions of “major” and “winter” and the identification of the triggering event that constitutes leaving NATO and the EU?
NoPie 4y ago
Why would a country leave NATO and become a target to be conquered by Russia? I don't believe any such country is so suicidal.
jareds 4y ago
The United States does not need to win a war, they just need to provide enough military support to Ukraine so that the resources Russia devotes to Ukraine reduce their expeditionary military capability. Russia is already pulling forces out of Syria and is not getting involved in the Azerbaijan Armenia conflict even though by treaty they should be supporting Armenia.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
WastingMyTime89 4y ago
Technically Russia has already lost the war. Their military capacities are greatly diminished. Their economy suffered and will keep suffering as long as the sanctions are in place. Some of their formerly main commercial partners are looking into using different suppliers. Their standing in the international order was diminished. Even China who has an interest in weakening NATO seems a bit annoyed at them and is not providing much support. Russia is definitely not going to take Ukraine as long as the west supports its military effort. The question now is what’s the USA end game here and how do we go there without backing Russia to much into a corner so they don’t feel they have to use the nuclear option.
- pstuart 4y ago
  Russia has been publicly humiliated by the dismal state of their military. Sure, they have nukes and more cannon fodder but I'm guessing that their neighbors feel slightly less threatened.
  - kbelder 4y ago
    Well, it's a mix. Russia is far weaker than previously thought, but also perhaps more dangerous and unpredictable. That's why NATO membership will expand.
    - pstuart 4y ago
      Clearly still a threat, but only in going full on MAD. The rumors of Putin's health failing are disquieting -- if he has nothing left to lose he may try to take the rest of us down with him.
      - deleted 4y ago
        [deleted]
- remarkEon 4y ago
  >The question now is what’s the USA end game here and how do we go there without backing Russia to much into a corner so they don’t feel they have to use the nuclear option. The most convincing argument I've heard in favor of continued US involvement in the war is that the objective is primarily about degrading Russian combat power such that, should a hot war kick off in the Pacific (over the Spratlys, over Taiwan, etc), Russia does not enter as a co-belligerent with CCP against the US + Japan. This implies that there is indeed some limit where we decide that there isn't much left in the tank for Russia to leverage in that theater. However, determining what exactly that limit is is a separate question, and this is some rather cold-hearted calculus because it admits that NATO's involvement doesn't have much to do with Ukrainian "democracy", which to me seems to be true. Edit: bad grammar
Arnt 4y ago
There are protests in Germany? Really? I passed one last week. It was one city block long. I've seen bigger protests organised by this political party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Pogo_Party_of_Germany https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Pogo_Party_of_German...
Blackstone4 4y ago
It is probably because many disagree with you.. most countries want to be in NATO more than ever to group up against the Russian threat… highly doubt one would leave..on balance more will try to join than leave. Russia is weakened and has lost support from previously neutral countries. The US doesn’t need to fight Russia and China. Straw man argument… since that scenario is highly unlikely. In any case, it’s US & NATO allies versus who ever… the Chinese want to make money and become economically dominant…which doesn’t align well with war when you want to trade… Your view is so upside down…I almost believe you are a Russian troll
- NoPie 4y ago
  Probably not a troll, just someone who really roots for Russia and Putin. I have seen my Russian acquaintances and even friends to believe all kinds of nonsense about this war. Mostly it is due to blind nationalism when one cannot tolerate anything that threatens the view that his nation is the best and should lead the world. Sometimes it is just contrarianism – if the policies started by the West have been largely more successful, then one needs to find a case where they were wrong and overemphasize this point.
  - Blackstone4 4y ago
    Honestly I can say the same thing for anyone including Americans!!
junon 4y ago
I live in Germany, people here are generally pro-Ukraine. Haven't heard of any protests personally. You sure about that?
fknorangesite 4y ago
> thanks for the downvotes. I'm sorry that truth-seeking bothers you Being petulant isn't going to make your case any stronger.
rchaud 4y ago
Unless that one single country leaving NATO is the US, it won't matter vis-a-vis military support for Ukraine.
arghnoname 4y ago
I've been following this issue since the Maiden events of 2014 (trying to use neutral terms here) and much more closely since the onset of what the Russians call the special military operation. It's been surreal to see the consensus opinion on this issues here in the west. As the old saying goes, the first casualty in war is the truth. I don't pretend to know what's going on from my vantage point, but I'm struck by the simplistic, moralistic, and confident view that I constantly hear from western sources. Personally, I think this war has been very costly for Russia. Wars usually are, but that this has been extremely costly for Ukraine, orders of magnitude worse. Further, as bad as the economic sanctions are for Russia, the boomeranging economic harm of the sanctions on Europe will probably have severe consequences with unpredictable political repercussions. Further, I think western sources misunderstand Russian motives and goals and have an incomplete understanding of who is doing the actual fighting in Ukraine. Both sides of the war in Ukraine are largely fought by Ukrainian citizens (i.e., the "Russians" in the east are mostly Ukrainian separatists, to some extent Russia is fighting the war by proxy too). Unmistakably, this is a massive tragedy for Ukrainians and I think it was avoidable. I wish we were more introspective about what role the west has played in this conflict and continues to play to minimize future catastrophes and hopefully bring this to a resolution more quickly. I don't and can't know who is "winning," but I'm pretty sure we're all losers in this conflict. In the end, Russia will probably control the regions of the DPR and LPR and its primary trading partners (particularly for energy) will be the east. China and India long term are probably the only winners--they will get subsidized energy and be economically more competitive compared to European industry. The American goal of weakening and isolating Russia may ultimately be a success; I don't think it will have been worth it. I sure wish the Minsk accords had just been followed and this all could have been avoided.
- NoPie 4y ago
  I think you misunderstand both Russia and the West. Russia wants to conquer Ukraine and the EU wants to prevent it. While the ways to do it diplomatically may have been wrong and therefore failed, it primary is the responsibility of the aggressor (Russia) for high count of casualties both Russian and Ukrainian. >> Unmistakably, this is a massive tragedy for Ukrainians and I think it was avoidable. What exactly you think should have been done to avoid this?
kmbfjr 4y ago
>EDIT: thanks for the downvotes. I'm sorry that truth-seeking bothers you <shrug> Conjecture is not truth, friend.
pixl97 4y ago
It's funny how you mention that protests in the west are weakness... The west allows protests (for the most part) meanwhile in Russia we see jail sentences for anyone that even mentions that this is a 'war'. Why would anyone leave NATO when a nutcase with nukes is threatening everyone around? This just makes Russia look even weaker.
samanator 4y ago
It's sad to see on hackernews that a serious controversial opinion is downvoted to this degree, even if it's viewed as factually dubious.

NicoJuicy 4y ago

Based on what? Russia's GDP deprecated and the area they need to control is too big for them to handle. Eg. Just look at the CSTO

nocoiner 4y ago

> Expect to see one major EU country leave NATO and the EU this winter. I’d be interested in taking the other side of this wager, quite possibly at even money odds depending on nailing down specifics. Would you care to discuss definitions of “major” and “winter” and the identification of the triggering event that constitutes leaving NATO and the EU?

NoPie 4y ago

Why would a country leave NATO and become a target to be conquered by Russia? I don't believe any such country is so suicidal.

jareds 4y ago

The United States does not need to win a war, they just need to provide enough military support to Ukraine so that the resources Russia devotes to Ukraine reduce their expeditionary military capability. Russia is already pulling forces out of Syria and is not getting involved in the Azerbaijan Armenia conflict even though by treaty they should be supporting Armenia.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

WastingMyTime89 4y ago

Technically Russia has already lost the war. Their military capacities are greatly diminished. Their economy suffered and will keep suffering as long as the sanctions are in place. Some of their formerly main commercial partners are looking into using different suppliers. Their standing in the international order was diminished. Even China who has an interest in weakening NATO seems a bit annoyed at them and is not providing much support. Russia is definitely not going to take Ukraine as long as the west supports its military effort. The question now is what’s the USA end game here and how do we go there without backing Russia to much into a corner so they don’t feel they have to use the nuclear option.

pstuart 4y ago
Russia has been publicly humiliated by the dismal state of their military. Sure, they have nukes and more cannon fodder but I'm guessing that their neighbors feel slightly less threatened.
- kbelder 4y ago
  Well, it's a mix. Russia is far weaker than previously thought, but also perhaps more dangerous and unpredictable. That's why NATO membership will expand.
  - pstuart 4y ago
    Clearly still a threat, but only in going full on MAD. The rumors of Putin's health failing are disquieting -- if he has nothing left to lose he may try to take the rest of us down with him.
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
remarkEon 4y ago
>The question now is what’s the USA end game here and how do we go there without backing Russia to much into a corner so they don’t feel they have to use the nuclear option. The most convincing argument I've heard in favor of continued US involvement in the war is that the objective is primarily about degrading Russian combat power such that, should a hot war kick off in the Pacific (over the Spratlys, over Taiwan, etc), Russia does not enter as a co-belligerent with CCP against the US + Japan. This implies that there is indeed some limit where we decide that there isn't much left in the tank for Russia to leverage in that theater. However, determining what exactly that limit is is a separate question, and this is some rather cold-hearted calculus because it admits that NATO's involvement doesn't have much to do with Ukrainian "democracy", which to me seems to be true. Edit: bad grammar

Arnt 4y ago

There are protests in Germany? Really? I passed one last week. It was one city block long. I've seen bigger protests organised by this political party: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Pogo_Party_of_Germany https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_Pogo_Party_of_German...

Blackstone4 4y ago

It is probably because many disagree with you.. most countries want to be in NATO more than ever to group up against the Russian threat… highly doubt one would leave..on balance more will try to join than leave. Russia is weakened and has lost support from previously neutral countries. The US doesn’t need to fight Russia and China. Straw man argument… since that scenario is highly unlikely. In any case, it’s US & NATO allies versus who ever… the Chinese want to make money and become economically dominant…which doesn’t align well with war when you want to trade… Your view is so upside down…I almost believe you are a Russian troll

NoPie 4y ago
Probably not a troll, just someone who really roots for Russia and Putin. I have seen my Russian acquaintances and even friends to believe all kinds of nonsense about this war. Mostly it is due to blind nationalism when one cannot tolerate anything that threatens the view that his nation is the best and should lead the world. Sometimes it is just contrarianism – if the policies started by the West have been largely more successful, then one needs to find a case where they were wrong and overemphasize this point.
- Blackstone4 4y ago
  Honestly I can say the same thing for anyone including Americans!!

junon 4y ago

I live in Germany, people here are generally pro-Ukraine. Haven't heard of any protests personally. You sure about that?

fknorangesite 4y ago

> thanks for the downvotes. I'm sorry that truth-seeking bothers you Being petulant isn't going to make your case any stronger.

rchaud 4y ago

Unless that one single country leaving NATO is the US, it won't matter vis-a-vis military support for Ukraine.

arghnoname 4y ago

I've been following this issue since the Maiden events of 2014 (trying to use neutral terms here) and much more closely since the onset of what the Russians call the special military operation. It's been surreal to see the consensus opinion on this issues here in the west. As the old saying goes, the first casualty in war is the truth. I don't pretend to know what's going on from my vantage point, but I'm struck by the simplistic, moralistic, and confident view that I constantly hear from western sources. Personally, I think this war has been very costly for Russia. Wars usually are, but that this has been extremely costly for Ukraine, orders of magnitude worse. Further, as bad as the economic sanctions are for Russia, the boomeranging economic harm of the sanctions on Europe will probably have severe consequences with unpredictable political repercussions. Further, I think western sources misunderstand Russian motives and goals and have an incomplete understanding of who is doing the actual fighting in Ukraine. Both sides of the war in Ukraine are largely fought by Ukrainian citizens (i.e., the "Russians" in the east are mostly Ukrainian separatists, to some extent Russia is fighting the war by proxy too). Unmistakably, this is a massive tragedy for Ukrainians and I think it was avoidable. I wish we were more introspective about what role the west has played in this conflict and continues to play to minimize future catastrophes and hopefully bring this to a resolution more quickly. I don't and can't know who is "winning," but I'm pretty sure we're all losers in this conflict. In the end, Russia will probably control the regions of the DPR and LPR and its primary trading partners (particularly for energy) will be the east. China and India long term are probably the only winners--they will get subsidized energy and be economically more competitive compared to European industry. The American goal of weakening and isolating Russia may ultimately be a success; I don't think it will have been worth it. I sure wish the Minsk accords had just been followed and this all could have been avoided.

NoPie 4y ago
I think you misunderstand both Russia and the West. Russia wants to conquer Ukraine and the EU wants to prevent it. While the ways to do it diplomatically may have been wrong and therefore failed, it primary is the responsibility of the aggressor (Russia) for high count of casualties both Russian and Ukrainian. >> Unmistakably, this is a massive tragedy for Ukrainians and I think it was avoidable. What exactly you think should have been done to avoid this?

kmbfjr 4y ago

>EDIT: thanks for the downvotes. I'm sorry that truth-seeking bothers you <shrug> Conjecture is not truth, friend.

pixl97 4y ago

It's funny how you mention that protests in the west are weakness... The west allows protests (for the most part) meanwhile in Russia we see jail sentences for anyone that even mentions that this is a 'war'. Why would anyone leave NATO when a nutcase with nukes is threatening everyone around? This just makes Russia look even weaker.

samanator 4y ago

It's sad to see on hackernews that a serious controversial opinion is downvoted to this degree, even if it's viewed as factually dubious.