6 ms·
I can't imagine a company saying "sorry, we have to let you go because we saw a naked pic of you on xvideos in a non-sexual context made by a creep"
by arblor 4y ago
I can't imagine a company saying "sorry, we have to let you go because we saw a naked pic of you on xvideos in a non-sexual context made by a creep"
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- imtringued 4y agoDo you think HR is going to investigate? The type of company that rejects you for something like that is just going to look at the thumbnail and not mention why they haven't hired you.
- infinite_beam 4y agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-62601044 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-62601044
- lazide 4y agoOf course they wouldn’t say it, generally, you’d just be round filed along with 90%+ of the other applicants and never know why. Unless they’re entertainingly dumb, in which case they’ll bring screenshots. Which has happened. Most companies don’t want drama with, around, or from employees. They want people who get what they need done, done. Something comes up that looks like drama? Round file. And good luck contesting it if they do this - courts generally give quite wide discretion to hiring decisions like this. It would need to be explicitly based on a protected class, which is quite narrow, AND they’d have to have documented it as such - which they’d have to be complete idiots to do. Oh, and you’d have to know about, and find the documentation.
- mrguyorama 4y agoThen you aren't very imaginative. Teachers have literally had this happen to them for a couple decades now. As have politicians.