6 ms·

Given you only mention censorship/chilling effect and not privacy - why isn't 8.8.8.8 sufficient? Have there been instances of domains it censored and stopped r

by nmjohn 5y ago

Given you only mention censorship/chilling effect and not privacy - why isn't 8.8.8.8 sufficient? Have there been instances of domains it censored and stopped resolving that I'm not aware of? I guess I'm confused on the benefit (theoretical or practical) one would get by using that variety of resolvers. Is it just to prevent theoretical censorship at the DNS level?

charcircuit 5y ago
Same with 1.1.1.1 (the case where archive.is used to not work was archive.is's nameserver purposefully being configured to return bad results to 1.1.1.1)
tambeb 5y ago
My question exactly. In another comment here I asked for some examples for the claim that some .ru domains were being black holed.