5 ms·

My mind went completely diff direction after reading "Incident AT".

by rarba786 5y ago

hericium 5y ago
Mine as well. I understand that Slack is widely used and I appreciate seeing their post-mortems discussed on HN but I don't consider image uploads issues with no technical explanations news-worthy and valuable enough for HN.
- mritzmann 5y ago
  > but I don't consider image uploads issues with no technical explanations news-worthy and valuable enough for HN Have you read the status entry? Among other things, calls is also affected.
  - hericium 5y ago
    Still not an "incident at Slack".
    - olingern 5y ago
      Disagree. Last outage was a slow degradation in usability. I appreciate when companies are transparent and upfront.
  - lenn0x 5y ago
    been seeing 100% failures on webhook event subscriptions too. that's only reason I noticed right away.
- kowlo 5y ago
  It seems you are of the minority... it's on the front page
  - hericium 5y ago
    A 404 link with a catchy title and "Show HN" raided from Twitter were also on the front page in recent hours.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]
mmaunder 5y ago
Yeah really bad choice of word. “Availability” or “Degraded” is what they’re looking for.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
yucky 5y ago
Same, this read like workplace violence. "Outage At" would be more accurate.