6 ms·

As a new Mac convert, why would one use this, instead of VirtualBox?

by alexg0 15y ago

gojomo 15y ago
I've had VirtualBox freeze on me a few times in just the last month or so I've tried it, but can't remember any Fusion lock-ups in almost 2 years of use.
- m_eiman 15y ago
  That's the reason I've switched to Fusion - too many of those random freezes was too much for my virtual Windows to handle, and it just plain stopped working. File system or disk image corruption, most likely.
pat2man 15y ago
Fusion and Parallels both are a bit faster than VirtualBox and have more features. Also, VMWare VMs will work with any VMWare product so if you are working with a team that uses VMWare elsewhere its nice to have. If you are just trying to run a Windows app or two you are probably better off with VirtualBox since its free.
- evilduck 15y ago
  Except for OSX VMs built using Fusion's built-in capabilities. The other VMware products don't ship the required libraries to boot them.
  - yardie 15y ago
    You have to downgrade the vmx to prep a fusion vm to be loaded into esx. Or you can download the vmware convertor app that will transfer the vm, convert the vmx, and register the vm in esx. I use the application weekly for this task.
    - evilduck 15y ago
      I meant OSX as a guest OS.
      - yardie 15y ago
        For that you'll need a machine with SMC and only Macs have it.
- Uchikoma 15y ago
  My reason: I've been using VirtualBox for running dev server environments. What happened: VM shutdowns, without any way to start them again (buttons just gray), files corrupted, interfaces lost, ....
matwood 15y ago
Because of freezes and VM corruption. I've been using Fusion for years and never had any problems. It's worth the $40 (look around for a $10 off coupon code), if you're using the VMs for anything more than hobby/testing random OSes.
evilduck 15y ago
I prefer VMware's method of handling dual screen guests better. VirtualBox creates two windows that each have to be manually full screened, Fusion just magically handles both monitors from the same window when you tell it to use both in full screen. Fusion is much more "Mac-like" and feels at home on OSX. Virtual Box is great if you can't afford something else (and often sufficient), but Virtual Box on OSX feels too much like Virtual Box on Windows or Linux, it just feels slightly out of place.

As a new Mac convert, why would one use this, instead of VirtualBox?

by alexg0 15y ago

As a new Mac convert, why would one use this, instead of VirtualBox?

I've had VirtualBox freeze on me a few times in just the last month or so I've tried it, but can't remember any Fusion lock-ups in almost 2 years of use.

m_eiman 15y ago
That's the reason I've switched to Fusion - too many of those random freezes was too much for my virtual Windows to handle, and it just plain stopped working. File system or disk image corruption, most likely.

pat2man 15y ago

Fusion and Parallels both are a bit faster than VirtualBox and have more features. Also, VMWare VMs will work with any VMWare product so if you are working with a team that uses VMWare elsewhere its nice to have. If you are just trying to run a Windows app or two you are probably better off with VirtualBox since its free.

evilduck 15y ago
Except for OSX VMs built using Fusion's built-in capabilities. The other VMware products don't ship the required libraries to boot them.
- yardie 15y ago
  You have to downgrade the vmx to prep a fusion vm to be loaded into esx. Or you can download the vmware convertor app that will transfer the vm, convert the vmx, and register the vm in esx. I use the application weekly for this task.
  - evilduck 15y ago
    I meant OSX as a guest OS.
    - yardie 15y ago
      For that you'll need a machine with SMC and only Macs have it.
Uchikoma 15y ago
My reason: I've been using VirtualBox for running dev server environments. What happened: VM shutdowns, without any way to start them again (buttons just gray), files corrupted, interfaces lost, ....

matwood 15y ago

Because of freezes and VM corruption. I've been using Fusion for years and never had any problems. It's worth the $40 (look around for a $10 off coupon code), if you're using the VMs for anything more than hobby/testing random OSes.

evilduck 15y ago

I prefer VMware's method of handling dual screen guests better. VirtualBox creates two windows that each have to be manually full screened, Fusion just magically handles both monitors from the same window when you tell it to use both in full screen. Fusion is much more "Mac-like" and feels at home on OSX. Virtual Box is great if you can't afford something else (and often sufficient), but Virtual Box on OSX feels too much like Virtual Box on Windows or Linux, it just feels slightly out of place.