6 ms·
I’ve heard that. How do you find racket for speed and also interactive development? I don’t mind a bit of scheme / racket, so would be curious to jump in.
by math-dev 5y ago
I’ve heard that. How do you find racket for speed and also interactive development?
I don’t mind a bit of scheme / racket, so would be curious to jump in.
- vindarel 5y agoRacket is not so interactive: https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1ca7ac https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1...
- Decabytes 5y agoMy most recent example is a prime sieve I wrote in Racket which was at least 10% faster than the Python implementation (can’t remember the exact number right now) I modeled it after, and then another 10% faster than that when I converted it to typed-racket[1] For interactive development it’s true Racket isn’t as heavy into top level development as other lisps, but I often run my code and then play around with modifications to it in the repo afterwards using racket-mode in Emacs. [1] https://github.com/diego-crespo/Primes/blob/drag-race/PrimeRacket/solution_1/prime-racket-types.rkt https://github.com/diego-crespo/Primes/blob/drag-race/PrimeR...