5 ms·
Launch HN: Level (YC S21) – Flexible financing for early-stage lending startups
Hey Hacker News, We’re Vlad, Molly, and Asa from Level (https://trylevel.app/ https://trylevel.app/). We allow lending companies to trade their loan receivables into upfront working capital that gets them off the ground and grows with them as they scale.
Building a lending company is challenging because it requires a lot of capital to get started. You need lending history to access capital, but you can’t access capital until you have a history of lending. To get around this, founders traditionally raise a large dilutive equity round and then lend off their balance sheet, or they find a family office or credit fund willing to offer a loan, which usually comes with high interest rates, warrants, and covenants. Even once your company succeeds in reaching the scale necessary to secure a traditional loan, the process takes at least 3 to 6 months and costs >$100k in legal fees to set up.
We didn’t think to work on this problem until it came to us. During a process of pivoting from a different business, a lot of fintechs were asking for help with raising debt from our CEO Vlad, who was a venture debt banker at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). Vlad provided connections to traditional debt providers, but these startups were turned down because traditional debt providers don’t work with pre-seed or seed stage startups—the deals are just too small. Since a lot of these startups were showing solid progress, and were being turned down for reasons having nothing to do with how good their business was, we decided that this was a good problem to tackle.
Also, companies like Pipe and Capchase turn MRR receivables into upfront capital for companies with recurring revenue. It seemed to us that the same principle could be applied to the loan receivables of lending companies, where the problem is even more painful.
Our solution is to purchase loans that lending startups have originated at a discounted rate, then forward the customer’s loan payments to Level as they come in. If you are familiar with financial arrangements, it’s similar to a forward flow agreement (https://www.finleycms.com/what-is-forward-flow https://www.finleycms.com/what-is-forward-flow). It’s different, though, in that we calculate the discount of purchasing loans by integrating directly into a company's ongoing bank balance and loan performance. This enables companies to get a lower cost of capital as they become a stronger lender and more stable business.
We integrate with a startup’s banks via integrations similar to Plaid, making it possible to track the company’s cash position and burn rate. In addition, we integrate with their loan management system to watch loan performance over time. In the event of default or prepayment, the company can buy back the non-performing loan or substitute in a new one. We allow a startup to sell more loans as its loan book grows and becomes more predictable, providing a flexible alternative to costly warehouse facilities. We make money by buying loan receivables at a discount from the total value of the receivables we collect.
If lending startups get better access to capital at the earliest stages, more companies will enter the market and drive competition based on the merits of the financial services they provide. This is good for existing borrowers and opens up new finance options for the underbanked and unbanked.
We’re building Level so that innovative founders can responsibly scale up a lending business without traditional constraints. We’d love to hear the community’s ideas, experiences, and feedback so we can do our best on this problem. Thanks!
- bstrong 5y agoI generally try to be encouraging of people putting themselves out there to create something new, but I'm worried that you're creating a pretty serious moral hazard for the founders you're trying to help. It's the kind of situation that can lead well-intentioned people to make bad decisions.
- vkorshin 5y agoThis is simply a tool to help founders get access to non-dilutive growth options, since right now they have very few alternatives at the earliest stages. We start with a safe amount of leverage and increase it as loan performance becomes predictable.
- mritchie712 5y agoCool, but who’s lending to you?
- jetblowfish 5y agoGood question. Right now we are building customer empathy feeling the challenge of starting a new lending business. The choices for us are similar to the customers we serve. Either we: 1) lend off of our balance sheet 2) sell equity of the company to power more lending 3) prove a longer track record for traditional debt providers to do a larger debt deal 4) open up a marketplace so that debt providers can use Level to invest in alternative assets that they might not otherwise have access to We're going to be exploring a collection of these techniques to see what can be a scalable source of capital for both Level and the customers we serve.
- lquist 5y agoHow does this become big? As soon as your customers hit ~$10M in annual lending volume, it makes much more sense for them to go direct and cut you (and your fees) out.
- jetblowfish 5y agoGood question. We’ve so far noticed that going direct can still be a painful process, where deals can take a long time to close (3-6 months) or take a lot of legal fees ($100k+). We've also seen that companies lending at a larger scale are still trying to diversify their source of capital. This is definitely a challenge we will face as we continue to try and serve larger customers and are hopeful that by focusing on having integrations into financials and streamlining the process, we can make Level the first choice of capital even as customers hit larger lending volumes.